2006-09-15 14:55:36 · 12 answers · asked by ☻Cool Beans☺ 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
i was thinking the same thing...
2006-09-15 15:15:49 · answer #1 · answered by Ryan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A wood chuck would chuck as much wood as a wood chuck could chuck wood.
2006-09-15 21:58:00 · answer #2 · answered by Laura G 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would chuck the entire wood(s) if it could chuck wood the way you said it would !
2006-09-16 09:37:39 · answer #3 · answered by Spiritualseeker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
as much wood as a wood chuck could if the wood chuck would chuck wood.
2006-09-15 22:15:24 · answer #4 · answered by polly wants crack 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wood chucks can chuck wood. Get it?
2006-09-15 22:41:50 · answer #5 · answered by almostdead 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
7
2006-09-15 21:56:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Been there, done that.
This is about the unteempth time I have seen this on Y.A.
Sorry, but I don't care about the wood chuck anymore.
:( Don't care about the wood at all. Nada. Nunca. Nein. Nicht. Nil.
2006-09-15 22:08:31 · answer #7 · answered by Malika 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wood.
2006-09-15 22:01:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
how do you know he would even want to chuck wood?and what the hell is chucking wood anyway?
2006-09-16 00:27:28 · answer #9 · answered by ♥mama♥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the would chuck would chuck as much as it could, if it could chuck.
:)Thanks for the 2 points!!!
2006-09-15 22:22:13 · answer #10 · answered by natalie renee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
organic tomatoes
2006-09-15 22:47:44 · answer #11 · answered by Casey J 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋