http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060915/ap_on_re_us/mayor_indicted_5
I feel he is not guility. He was trying to fight crime and that is what he gets for that. I think he is innocent. Hopefully, the jury will think that as well.
2006-09-15 13:35:45 · 11 answers · asked by hottestfatperson 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I think he did right. He didn't hurt anyone and he exposed a drug house. Good for him.
2006-09-15 13:39:51 · answer #1 · answered by wowwhatwasthat 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I can see that he might possibly agree to a plea of performing home remodeling work without a contractor's license and/or building permit. And even that might be defensible if he can show that he only got to the tear-out stage of remodeling and never progressed to the installation and improvement stage. And when you factor into this defense that he wasn't charging anyone for the improvements, but doing it faith-based, as a volunteer of the lord, and doing the lord's work, why if I was on the jury my hands would be in the air and I'd be praising the Almighty for his generosity.
2006-09-15 13:44:27 · answer #2 · answered by nothing 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What happened to innocent until proven guilty? How would you feel if someone smashed your house because they "suspected drugs were being used" ? Not cool
2006-09-15 13:42:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This guy is crazy. Sorry. Only a judge should be able to determine if a drug house should be destroyed by sledgehammer. And he must have legal justication, at that. There must also be a conviction, first.
2006-09-15 13:41:08 · answer #4 · answered by wordnerd27x 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wish I could get to that site...maybe this computer's a dinosaur!! LOL If he was trying to fight crime, I'm all for it!
2006-09-15 13:43:05 · answer #5 · answered by altruistic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he was wrong. He can't just go around smashing up people's property just because he is the mayor and he disagrees with the goings on in the house.
2006-09-15 13:38:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
the only thing worse than the 'war on drugs' is a vigalante war on drugs....well intentioned or not he circumvented the laws that protect our human rights...he is guilty.
2006-09-15 13:40:42 · answer #7 · answered by lfnatu 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The jury will decide if he is guilty or not.
2006-09-15 13:38:25 · answer #8 · answered by none 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not guilty.
2006-09-15 14:25:06 · answer #9 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he was also causing crimes to happen....two wrongs does not make a right!!!
2006-09-15 13:38:51 · answer #10 · answered by Cap'n Donna 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋