English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Afterall, you could write to the next President and have him answer your personal question. There would be a permanent record of what their answer would be. You could cover every American citizen from around the globe. It would be very cheap to do, but time consuming. Right now how many of you have ever spoken to or asked W. a question and got an answer back?

2006-09-15 12:50:10 · 14 answers · asked by Mr. PDQ 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

14 answers

No there is a few requirements to be President.

1. You have to be MALE
2. You have to be WHITE
3. You have to be elected by either the Republican Party OR the Democratic Party. No independents need even try.
4. You have to be a BILLIONAIRE.

2006-09-15 12:54:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i think of it relies upon. there is an outstanding variety of communicate that she would take a Ted Kennedy like place contained in the Senate. i've got even heard communicate of her being nominated to the ideal court docket - in spite of the indisputable fact that her supporters say that she's extra of a fighter and a legislator than the ideal court docket facilitates. i'm curious however why you have been "bowled over" that she ended her marketing campaign. there substitute into no way she substitute into going to be waiting to win. Obama had the needed delegates. by using fact the Florida/Michigan difficulty got here to a first rate compromise that favored her better than Obama what case would she have on the credentials committee? For the Wiz: She have been given a extra physically powerful share of delegates in the two states, which favored her. She did win the states, whether it extremely is stressful to assert she gained them "far and sq." considering merely before the election no person theory the election would count number, there substitute into no campaigning, and he or she substitute into the only significant candidate on the Michigan poll. Obama did do away along with his call from the pollin protest of Michigan's formerly election - yet so did the different significant applicants different than Clinton, it wasn't merely Obama. provided that the democratic regulations enable for proportional allocation of the delegates anyhow, i think of that the DNC compromise substitute into common and he or she nevertheless gained extra delegates than Obama from those primaries as a effect. For Obama marketing campaign worker: Veeps by no potential pass directly to be Presidents?John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Martin Van Buren (ok a lesser familiar president), Richard Nixon, and George HW Bush, have been all VPs.

2016-10-01 00:19:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

you could try and tax payers in the long run would be grateful to know that you tried to find a way to run economically but really it wouldnt work there is the millions of other people who don't connect to this sort of thing. Actually if you let them know somehow that there was a way for answers to be provided that would be honest and straight forward................ Oh hold it we are talking about politicians here...........They never do anything economically they spend as much as they can and they dont want to talk to the american public nor do they give honest and straight forward answers to anyone. No this wouldn't work.

2006-09-15 13:00:18 · answer #3 · answered by gem753 3 · 0 0

So do you really think every American has internet access? Wow, that's pretty ignorant of the fact that we have lots of Americans that DON'T have internet connections because they can't afford it. You mean well, but it only reaches a fraction of the country. It doesn't address the poorer people's needs at all.

2006-09-15 13:02:59 · answer #4 · answered by N G 2 · 0 0

Of course Paul! You've got our support. Now let's see if it gets you farther than level 7...

2006-09-15 13:24:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No because there really isn't that many people doing this site.

2006-09-15 12:51:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Vote for me I'll oppress you

2006-09-15 12:57:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes. You

2006-09-15 12:51:54 · answer #8 · answered by bigbrowneyes 2 · 0 0

Were you thinking of nominating me?

2006-09-15 12:59:09 · answer #9 · answered by bitchenbrod 2 · 0 0

hmmm---you have a point----never. but I think the answer to your question is no.---why?---are you trying to run?

2006-09-15 12:52:41 · answer #10 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers