Alas, it was not to be.
2006-09-15 12:49:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Aurthor D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question is should one rebel against the status quo knowing that the denouement will only be negative. Should one have integrity and state that something is wrong when he will only lose at the end.
2006-09-15 19:41:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Steven S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shakespeare. Hamlet.
2006-09-15 19:36:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bronweyn 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Respectfully disagree. That is not THE question.
I think the THE question is "What to be"
Cheers
2006-09-15 21:55:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Zak D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd say it's not to be...
Not to be a knuckle head and mess with shakespeare.
Personally, I'll take the slings and arrows. They suite my personality much better than death.
2006-09-15 22:18:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, that's Hamlet's question. What's yours?
D
2006-09-15 23:36:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bugsy Groucho 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, its a deciding question
2006-09-15 19:37:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by sheikaella 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
To be... it's better to exist than not. Just think... you wouldn't be able to do anything at all if you didn't exist.
2006-09-15 21:47:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mike S 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yep, a real tough decision to make in life eh???
2006-09-15 19:39:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ali.D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
thats funny for sure
2006-09-15 21:49:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by vick 5
·
0⤊
0⤋