English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't get the republicans. They put down Kerry but Bush never went to Vietnam.

2006-09-15 11:00:51 · 17 answers · asked by Ebee 1 in Politics & Government Politics

Sup Alessssandraaaa!!!! Doing good and luv ur answers.

2006-09-15 11:06:42 · update #1

Tell me about it Bush-Deat.

2006-09-15 11:14:39 · update #2

17 answers

The fright-wing nutcase Repugnicians really ARE retarded, aren't they? Bush waves '9/11' and 'terrorism' around as though these words and numbers are our new flag, and they allow the whole mess to be spoon-fed to them. They've been FRIGHTENED into giving this thief unprecedented power, and yet call Liberals 'cowards'. And, of course, delude themselves into thinking that a DECORATED WAR VETERAN is 'spineless', while a daddy's boy like scumbag Dubya is some damned hero. He was stateside (thanks to Daddy's money and pull) snorting coke and boozing it up. PATHETIC.

2006-09-15 11:15:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 5

Hanoi John Kerry is a traitor. He demonstrated against the Vietnam War while still in the Uniform of a Naval Officer, while the war was still on and Military personnel were still getting killed, In 1971 while I and thousands of other men were still there, this SOB went before the Civillian Maggots in the Foreign Relations Committee and lied to them calling us baby killers, worst than Genhis Khan and all of that BS, then while still a commissioned Officer of the Naval Reserves went to Paris and met with the Communist Delegation from North Vietnam and talked to them on how to end the war, while Americans were dying and while POWs were still being held. The so-called medals that Hanoi John was suppose to have won
are suspect and the "wounds" that he received were nothing but bandaid wounds. For some reason
Peanut Carter granted him Amnesty for some reason. Hanoi John Kerry is unfit to be a Senator or President and should be impeached and brought up on charges of
treason and sedition.PERIOD!!!!!!!!!

2006-09-15 18:27:03 · answer #2 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 1

Because they know he's got a lot more on the ball than does Bush and were terrified he'd win the election in '04, so they started the smear campaign against him. Considering that the average IQ of the Christian conservative right is somewhere below that of a fungus (kind of like Bush's), they bought right into the smear campaign. Unlike Bush - whose wartime "service" consisted of being AWOL while campaigning for good old boys in the South - Kerry is an authentic war hero like his Republican counterpart John McCain (omigod - I said something good about a Republilcan!!!!) and the small minds in the Republican party had to focus on something other than the issues, so we got the smear campaign.

2006-09-15 18:30:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yeah he went to Nam alright, it would have been better for the vets if he had moved to Canada.
He probably voted to go to Canada before he voted against it. While we still had men and women in Nam he was back here telling congress that we were the evil ones. that the troops over there were committing all kinds of atrocities. You say oh well freedom of speech right? I say how would you feel if your brother was in a pow camp and Kerry was talking trash about the awful Americans in Nam? He is one war zero I would love to spit on!

2006-09-15 18:08:56 · answer #4 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 3 3

Apparently if Kerry split from Vietnam because he realized what war does, he must have forgotten that because he did vote for the present war. And besides, Vietnam was forty years ago and if Bush made a mistake then, how long can we hold it against him? How long do people hold mistakes against you?

2006-09-15 18:10:24 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 1 4

Yo Ebee wuzzup! Kerry isn't bad. He realized what war does, was smart, and split. At least he served but Bush bailed. He spent more time at cheerleading than his national guard service.

2006-09-15 18:04:47 · answer #6 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 4 3

I don't think that Kerry is bad. He would have been a better President than Bush!

2006-09-15 18:04:08 · answer #7 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 4 3

Kerry faked injurys for phoney purple hearts to bail him out of 'nam. Some he awarded to himself. He wanted to got to Viet Nam, before he didn't.

2006-09-15 18:14:06 · answer #8 · answered by ?Bob?NYC? 2 · 2 2

kerry is the the beast 666

2006-09-15 18:25:15 · answer #9 · answered by angel 3 · 2 1

I don't think he's bad at all. I doubt his ability to run the country though, just like I doubted the ability of Bush to do the same.

2006-09-15 18:04:17 · answer #10 · answered by rhymingron 6 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers