hes taking the piss he should try living on 200 quid a week .the mans a joke ,its just greed all players should have wage caps any way .how can you justify being paid 130 k a week for kicking a ball when a fireman who puts his life at risk to help others is on 300 quid a week ill swap wages with ballack for a week see how he gets on .what a tosser
2006-09-15 23:40:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
That statement sums Herr Ballack up quite well.
He's a footballer, who's reasonably good, but in no way deserves £130,000 a year, let alone a week.
If he wasn't a footballer, he'd no doubt be flipping burgers in Macdonalds...
..or be in prison.
He should try and live on the average wage for a few weeks, THEN he can complain about not being able to afford a house.
2006-09-15 11:00:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds like a selfish bast*rd to me. Try living on £15k a year with all the bills to pay and left with exactly what to spend on yourself? Damn right he is taking a mickey out of us working class people when you ask me, some people NEVER get to see that money in a life time. Its the only reason he decided to come to Chelsea so he could get a big pay slip.
2006-09-20 05:37:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by bluestar 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No , this amount of money is enough for some poor family to live for a long time,
The reason for him to said that is : He just lost 130,000 X 4 weeks ,when he lost a bet to his team mate..so he does not have any allowance to give to his family....etc Therefoe he got no mood to play for chelsea right now, that's why he's unable to score goal or create any chance for his teammates and in the end he got himself a RED card ....
Can send one please send him to a mental hospital for a check up!!!!
2006-09-17 06:45:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by eZY jOHn 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I dont agree with him,i think he is being greedy and selfish that he even considers hes worth that much.The fa should put a cap on the wage structure in this country after all its us the fanswho pay his wages etc. £50,000 a week should be the maxium in my book and even that is a little generous.
2006-09-20 21:43:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by hellraisersteve 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is insulting the majority of people who actually have to work hard for a living yet will never see anywhere near that sort of money in there lifetime...its obscene and he should be ashamed of himself. My husband would have to work 8 years to earn that before tax and we have 3 kids.Maybe I should invite him to swap places with him for a year and do 60 hours (shifts)a week!!
It makes me so angry.................
2006-09-15 11:02:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i am in college and can live on E70 a week, he must be wiping his a*&^ with 50's and eating kaviar for dinner, what more, he is over rated and not worth the colour of that kind of wage, he should be sacked and never hired in football again, bet u any money he could live on less than £200 a week, arrogant german basta^(.
2006-09-21 02:56:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by paddy.ryan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will kick him in the ballacks and then let him live with me for a week then he'll know what living is really like! The skanky tosser
2006-09-15 10:52:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by loopy lou 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Me + my hubby both work, him full-time, me part-time. We have 4 children and we live off £430 per week. We do have a mortgage, credit cards, etc.... He wants to try working 40hours for a couple of hundred quid!!!! He couldnt work 20 hours , he cant even manage 90mins on a footy pitch!!!!!!!!!!
2006-09-17 03:09:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by jriiselfc 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Is that all! Poor sod, he must spend a lot of time queueing at his local Social Services/Post Office trying to get his Family Allowances.
2006-09-15 10:55:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋