English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-15 10:37:44 · 20 answers · asked by toietmoi 6 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

20 answers

Your question reminds me of once when I was young school boy. I use to think - what would my image be like if I am at the centre of a spherical mirror? I do not find any better way to approach your question then this. For what is inside of a sphere is inside for us because we are at outside. And what our outside would be like form the inside of a sphere? Intriguing – a serious contortion in our perception of spacial reality.

Spheres and circles, unlike other geometrical concepts like squares and triangles, are universal, and are formed naturally in our physical world. These are the basic formulae behind the architect and the function of our universe. From a tiny electron to our conception of the entire physical universe, all is spherical in from and circular in function. All motions are simple circular harmonic motions round spherical objects by spherical objects in a spherically expaning universe. This is simply how the matter and its dynamics are managed universally. This is how all things material are rounded to certain limits in an otherwise unlimited continuum of space. In terms of human perception of reality a circle is a sign of association, belonging and devotion, and so is a sphere but with a world of its own that we like to explore. We like to stay around people and things we like or love, and we like to reach the centre of their being.

If a sphere is turned inside out then the entire nature of the physical reality will be reversed – the form that we cannot conceive. Our mental ability does not take us any further than the the question you have just asked, because we cannot imagine any further. We are not able to round things up to give them definite shapes and limited sizes – the nature of our physical world. We therefore can assume a world that does not exists due to its integral ability but due to it tendency to disintegrate. Where each star and planets contain all other stars and planets and gravity of a force of repulsion. Where small things are physically large and large things are physically small. It is crazy!

2006-09-16 01:23:41 · answer #1 · answered by Shahid 7 · 1 0

It depends. The entire universe might be inside out already.
In which case you'll be turning the ball outside in without knowing it.

2006-09-15 10:58:26 · answer #2 · answered by Mike N 2 · 2 0

It depends on the type of ball

I'd like to see you try to turn a golf ball inside out ;o)

2006-09-15 10:47:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You have an inside-out ball.

2006-09-15 10:47:55 · answer #4 · answered by Jude 7 · 2 0

Well, I suppose you'd just get another ball. But it's a duplicate of the original one EXCEPT it's inside out.

2006-09-15 11:12:09 · answer #5 · answered by angela 2 · 1 0

An inverse ball?

2006-09-15 10:44:06 · answer #6 · answered by mikayla_starstuff 5 · 1 0

assuming you meant the cover of the ball...topologically speaking...nothing happened

if you include the "guts" of the ball... I would assume that you could get a layered spheroid ...or a fuzzy pom-pom that's into leather

2006-09-15 21:04:03 · answer #7 · answered by Gemelli2 5 · 1 0

it stays a ball... but is just inside out, i suppose

2006-09-15 10:41:45 · answer #8 · answered by Helen 5 · 1 1

Quantum Mechanics??

2006-09-15 10:56:50 · answer #9 · answered by pacific_crush 3 · 0 1

you see the space inside

2006-09-16 09:48:45 · answer #10 · answered by shsimon 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers