Will a Democratic Congress with a Republican President bring balance or gridlock?

Question

Why?

Note: Would impeachment really be a good idea for democrats, if this happens? If you get rid of Bush, Cheney is president. If you get rid of both Pelosi is president. You can be sure that such a power play to put such a liberal democrat in this position would surely fire up the republican base, turn off independants and virtually assure a republican president in 08 and possibly republican congress. Wouldn't it be smarter to keep Bush in for 2 more years?

Answer 1

Gridlock.

Do you really see this president and a Democratic congress agreeing on much of anything?

Answer 2

Well now, first things first. The House looks like a lock, but let's not count our senators until they hatch.

Even if the dems win one house Bush will claim his lack of progress is because of a partisan gridlock. But aside from going to war and homeland security, which everyone agrees ignore border security, there has been little in the way of progress made with a Republican president and both houses of congress. Not a whole lot has happened in the past six years and a lot of people are frustrated by that.

So even if there is a gridlock, how will we ever notice?

Answer 3

Gridlock, but I am not sure we would see much difference from the current do-nothing Republicans we have now. At least the 1994 Gingrich Republicans had a plan for changing America, the current group want to change the world through imperialism.

Answer 4

Probably some gridlock at least. It would still be better than what we have now. I don't see this as a do nothing congress. I see it more as a do alot of the wrong things congress.

Answer 5

Much needed balance. A Democratic congress can help prevent many of Bush's awful ideas from coming to fruition.

Answer 6

Gridlock til a third party is involved. Two houses, one dem one Rep and a third party president is the way to go...

Answer 7

The main thing it will bring is accountability. With a majority in the house comes subpoena power, the ability to create and head major committees. Henry Waxman would start hearings into fraud and waste associated with no bid contracts for Iraq reconstruction, no bid contracts associated with Gulf Coast rebuilding efforts (or lack thereof). That's the main difference the American people will see.

Answer 8

first of all, The balanced funds is a delusion. the USA of a has never been out of crimson ink in present day circumstances. Carter never had one. on the same time as real his deficits have been modest, they have been nevertheless there. Clinton replaced into no longer in charge for the prosperity that the country had for the time of his administration. He took credit for the financial device G.H.W. Bush exceeded him. Gingrich's string pullers and the Republican Legislators have been regularly in charge for the funds concern. Clinton replaced into in charge for Giving nuclear technologies to N. Korea and Iran. replaced into that one in each of those reliable concept? the place are we at now as a consequence? in case you supply Clinton credit for what he actual did, you will locate out Mr. credit taker did no longer do alot and alot of what he did do has shown to be counter efficient in the long term. Clinton did no longer could manage our united states of america being attacked. He did no longer could manage the perplexing judgements of being at conflict. He did no longer face the themes we've immediately as a consequence of the international financial device and the oil producing countries. The president has little administration over oil costs. enable us to additionally remember the cost of our freedom isn't low-priced. Debt from WW II replaced into nevertheless being paid into the 1980's. on the same time as no person has chosen to call it that, in case you look on the entire midsection jap area, we are actual in WW III. As a footnote: remember, dispite the huge debt created by using WW II, it replaced into the unmarried maximum contibuting ingredient to the stunning financial enhance we knew in the 1950's. conflict is actual reliable for the financial device in the long-term.

Answer 9

Balance.
Once they impeach Bush and Cheney, and Nancy Pelosi becomes President, they can start to fix all the problems he created.

Answer 10

I don't think it matters, Congress barely gets anything done anyway...

They spend more time investigating baseball steriod usage than anything else, like the people actually care that much about it, to know their tax dollars are being wasted.