English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Okay, my friend had unprotected sex with a guy two years ago...a much older guy that has been known to shoot up. Anyways, she was married a few months afterwards (to a different man) and has never been checked. Her husband donates blood regularly and definately does not have it. Is there any possible way she does? She won't listen to me and get checked!

2006-09-15 05:19:38 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Women's Health

I'm printing this page for her so please give good answers with references if possible.

2006-09-15 05:25:52 · update #1

17 answers

It's definitely possible.

2006-09-15 05:21:55 · answer #1 · answered by Amanda 6 · 0 1

The only way to answer this question is to get an HIV test. Yes, it is possible that she is HIV+, if she had unprotected sex or shared needles.

HIV testing is completely anonymous. If she is still worried, offer to take her to a clinic in another city.

Won't both of you breathe a big sigh of relief if you get the test and it comes back negative? Or if positive, isn't it important for her to start talking to her doctor about her options?
Either of these is a good enough reason to encourage your friend to get tested RIGHT NOW.

Good luck!

2006-09-15 05:24:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hello. I just wanted to let you know to try to encourage your friend to be checked anyway. It actually is not unlikely. I am studying to be a medical lab tech right now and from what i have learned..the HIV virus can take up to 8 years to show up in a persons blood..meaning it is possibel to test negative even if you are positive. it is always better to be checked rather than ignore the posibility. i know this dont have anythign to do with your friend but also a person can actually be a carrier of HIV and never actually get sick from it. HIV lies dormant in the blood stream for some time..this in english this means that it hides. i would have her get checked just to be sure..i hope i could help.

2006-09-15 05:33:56 · answer #3 · answered by sjdjnd20 2 · 0 0

particular because of the fact the different poster reported that's in fact conceivable. I incredibly have many friends with HIV and AIDS however many at the instant are lifeless and long previous I incredibly have 3 that are in dedicated relationships their companions and spouses be responsive to and that they have got a lively intercourse life and function no longer gotten it. certainly one of my desirable friends had a toddler 5 years in the past. Her husband died this year simply by AIDS proper issues. her and the newborn are the two AIDS and HIV unfastened. healthful as they are able to be. What gets me maximum in this however is the fact you're meant to be her chum and yet you do no longer have confidence and have confidence her She for sure felt you have been a competent sufficient chum to share this and yet you do no longer return that comradeship incredibly she did no longer could enable you be responsive to something She despite if trusts and values the friendship and became truthful with you

2016-11-07 09:35:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It turns out that yes, it is possible that she has HIV and has not passed it on to her husband.

It is unlikely, but it is certainly possible.

The niaid gov fact sheet says:

"In this country, studies have shown that during unprotected heterosexual intercourse with an HIV-infected partner, women have a greater risk of becoming infected than uninfected men who have heterosexual intercourse with an HIV-infected woman. In other parts of the world, however, this is not necessarily true. In Uganda, for example, one study demonstrated that the risk of HIV transmission from woman to man was the same as from man to woman. This difference may be due to the lack of circumcision in Ugandan men."

However, after 18-22 months, one would sort of expect that they have had sex several times and on a statistical basis feel that she is likely to have passed it on to him by now if she had it.

Still it is possible that she is HIV positive and has not passed it on to her partner.

There is also the question of how many times they have had unprotected intercourse! (Maybe they haven't)

My feeling is that her husband doesn't know his risk and she doesn't want to tell him. It might clear the air for her if she gets a test and finds that she is negative.

I wonder if she is aware of her legal obligations.

2006-09-15 05:32:42 · answer #5 · answered by Orinoco 7 · 0 0

Yes,of course there is any possible way she can have it. Maybe she won't go because she is scared of the answer she may receive. Anyone who ever has sex or uses the same needle (like a dumbas-) needs to get checked every so often.

2006-09-15 05:24:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There's a possibility that she could have caught HIV from the unprotected sex, but if she did she would have given it to her husband by this time. I'd advise both of them get tested, and if she won't it's her problem.

2006-09-15 05:22:33 · answer #7 · answered by Blue Jean 6 · 0 0

she should get checked but if its been two years and her husband hasnt been rejected she most likley doesnt because it takes 6 months to a year to show up in most cases and it would have propbably shown on her hubby by now but i still say its safer to be tested if caught in time there is a cocktail the md can give to stop the spread through the bloodstream i have a great friend who has aids right now no symptoms but has carried it for 3yrs please get tested

2006-09-15 05:26:59 · answer #8 · answered by chloe dog 2 · 0 0

If its been a few year and her husband hasn't then no i doubt it she would have passed it to him to by now but i agree she was foolish to have never got tested in the first place i would suggest she still get tested tho i think (maybe wrong) HIV can lie dormant for 10 year

2006-09-15 05:25:13 · answer #9 · answered by tweetypie88888 4 · 0 0

Always remeber, that hiv antibodies can take months if not up to years to be detected with a test. She should really consider getting checked every so often..she can help herself and not infect others as well. Good Luck!

2006-09-15 06:12:16 · answer #10 · answered by Mermaid 2 · 0 0

It's really not very likely that she wouldn't have any symptoms after two years if she was infected. It's also unlikely that she wouldn't have passed it to her husband by now if she wasn't infected.

However, the only way to know is to have a test.

2006-09-15 05:22:52 · answer #11 · answered by trivial 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers