English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When one of these crazy leaders who have accesss to nuclear weapons decided to use it on us or one of our allies, will you admit maybe you were wrong about him?
He is debreifed daily on our enemies are you privy to such top secret information?
Sit and do nothing to prevent such an attack is so foolish.

2006-09-15 04:43:57 · 11 answers · asked by darlndanna 3 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Let's see...Where did they get their access to nuclear technology? Hmmmm...Can we say Pakistan? Which is "supposedly" an ally of ours. Iran, North Korea, and Libya all got assistance with their programs from the head of the Pakistan Nuclear agency. And what happened to him? He got pardoned for exporting nuclear technology.

Did you stop and think that maybe they wouldn't have sped up their programs if we hadn't invaded Iraq? Maybe if they weren't scared of the cowboy diplomacy used by the Bush administration they may not have the nukes they have now.

It's funny how North Korea went from having 1 or 2 prior to the invasion to now having better than 12 nukes.

2006-09-15 04:52:29 · answer #1 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 3 0

Bush isn't owed an apology even if we are attacked. He didn't give them those weapons. He's too dumb to make a transaction like that. America gave Iraq WMD's yes they are there and anyone who tries to deny it is just an idiot who happens to be anti-war. That's not to say that all those opposed to the war are idiots that's just to specify the people who try to turn a blind eye to how well we armed Iraq... Weapons dealings are how the Bush family got into politics, Prescott Bush was a genius politician slash banker who helped us cover our tracks after we sold cyanide to the Nazi's in Germany. He even helped those transactions go through with some of his own money. Years later very little has changed with the US. We provide the weapons that promote atrocities get disgusted and after we destroy the evidence that we created them and provided the criminals the means to carry them out, we go in and pretend we are heroes.

2006-09-15 05:04:21 · answer #2 · answered by Rick R 5 · 2 0

a million. utilising the administrative order technique to thwart the % of the yank people. 2. utilising the 9/11 assaults as an excuse to harm the bill of Rights. 3. Invading Iraq whilst it had no longer something to do with 9/11 and there have been no terrorists there. 4. utilising his ability and the Republican Congress to suck as plenty funds out of the gadget as conceivable interior the final 8 years, the main interior the final 2 weeks. How risk-free might u . s . a . be if he had finished the interest in Afghanistan rather of leaving in the back of it some months in to attack yet another united states which had no longer something to do with terrorism? How risk-free might we be if rather of squandering 4000 lives and on the brink of 1000000000000 American money in Iraq the money were invested in incredibly remaining the borders and analyzing better than 2% of incoming shipment? and worried's whiny placed up a pair of distinctive era and a distinctive conflict is actual to a undeniable quantity. lower back then, individuals could desire to look and notice the hazards of Nazi Germany and its attempt at conquest. it is why they have been prepared to flow alongside with it. they did no longer % a central authority to make up explanation why we could consistently invade a united states that had executed no longer something to us.

2016-11-07 09:30:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No - he owes the american people and the world an apology for screwing things up so badly. He creates terrorists with his idiotic stance against muslims. We are almost out of friends and can't fight the terrorists because no one trusts us enough to help us. Ask yourself - why now six years later most "intelligence" is still secret. Why hide ancient history? Bush needs to open up and show us the truth. Thats the american way. Period.

2006-09-15 05:24:13 · answer #4 · answered by notme 5 · 3 0

Considering that George W. and his father and his grandfather have all aided and armed and supported ruthless dictators for many years themselves, considering that George W. has close family and business ties with dictators now, considering that Saddam ONLY became the bad guy after his business deal with George HW went bad ...

Most of the problems America faces today were brought on ourselves by pure greed by a handful of greedy men.

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_carlyle.html

http://rain.prohosting.com/imoffi/njan12004.htm

2006-09-15 05:05:48 · answer #5 · answered by Doc Watson 7 · 1 0

No way

Bush is a criminally insane meglomaniac.

As for nuclear war bring it on. One Atom bomb in the Mideast would end all of this insanity.

We should be dropping Nutron bombs on all the global trouble spots. Starting with the UN Headquarters.

Go big Red Go

2006-09-15 04:53:17 · answer #6 · answered by 43 5 · 2 2

George W. Bush stood on the steps of the Capitol building, TWICE, and swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.

He should apologize to me for each and every one of his attempts to undermine that oath.

2006-09-15 04:59:15 · answer #7 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 3 1

Yes - he was debriefed about terrorists hijacking planes to attack us too.

What good did that do?

Apologize? No way.

I'll stand and wave good bye the day he leaves office

2006-09-15 04:49:20 · answer #8 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 2 1

I agree completely with Carpedeim

2006-09-15 04:57:40 · answer #9 · answered by Nolyn Hill 2 · 1 1

No way. I prefer to be led by intelligence, not fear.

2006-09-15 04:47:32 · answer #10 · answered by carpediem 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers