2006-09-15 04:33:33 · 7 answers · asked by GC 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
on the site I use it is curently a 12 spread with a 34 O/U. Baltimore looks good and Oak looks like the worst team ever. It is still a tough choice the bookies usually aren't too far off amazingly.
I say no they will not cover the 12, . I say a score of 21-10. Their defense is good, but their offense still needs a little help. I'm not totally sold on McNair.
They scored 27 last week, with a interception for a touchdown. Their defense will put the offense in good field position, but may not score this week (although I hope they do I have their defense in my fantasy league)
2006-09-15 04:50:02 · answer #1 · answered by Dz Nutz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And then some. Aaron Brooks ain't the answer, and neither is Andrew Walter. Raiders should be bad enough to get either Brady Quinn or Chris Leak in the 2007 draft.
2006-09-15 05:32:36 · answer #2 · answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they will. I don't see the Raiders receivers doing any better as long asTom Walsh is the OC and Aaron Brooks is the QB. They need to send Walsh back to his bed and breakfast, he was worthless the last time he was in the NFL.
2006-09-15 05:17:58 · answer #3 · answered by stan l 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends. if the raiders play like they did last week, baltimore should have no problem. However, i think that will not be the case this week. my money's on the raider's recieving team...hands down winners if they play well.
2006-09-15 04:38:00 · answer #4 · answered by SST 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes...but that is a lot of points to cover and it would take a lot of guts to bet on this one rather than another game
2006-09-15 04:38:11 · answer #5 · answered by ludacristic 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are going to get another shoutout
2006-09-15 04:52:37 · answer #6 · answered by doublea1126 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-09-15 04:42:16 · answer #7 · answered by Ladeebug71 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋