Who did/does a better job at being president…? Clinton or Bush?

Question

During the administration of William Jefferson Clinton, the U.S. enjoyed more peace and economic well being than at any time in its history.He was the first Democratic president since Franklin D. Roosevelt to wina second term. He could point to the lowest unemployment rate in modern times, the lowest inflation in 30 years, the highest home ownership in the country's history, dropping crime rates in many places, and reduced welfare roles. He proposed the first balanced budget in decades and achieved a budget surplus. As part of a plan to celebrate the millennium in 2000, Clinton called for a great national initiative to end racial discrimination. A record like that! Now compare it to Dubya’s record of utter incompetence…LOL!! Dubya didn’t get up there by him self…Don’t you just want to give him a hand to get down from there?

Answer 1

Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, Clinton, wait? let me answer for my family,....................Clinton, let me answer for my children...........Clinton, let me answer for the people at war, Clinton, let me answer for black people all around except for Mrs. Rice..........Clinton, let me answer for those who are out of jobs...............Clinton, let me answer for those victims of 9-11.............Clinton, Let me answer for those during the Katrina incident, Hell, Clinton!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Let me answer for you, Clinton. Good question.

Answer 2

ok dude take a step back. right here in Connecticut the place I stay, people love Clinton, and hate Bush. All presidents are made exciting of gently because of the fact theyre a nicely-known purpose. all of us is conscious who they are. Clinton didnt get impeached rather subsequently you listed, he have been given impeached because of the fact he LIED below OATH. Thats unlawful and is a actual crime. Bush, on the different hand, has executed no longer something unlawful, merely went against hundreds of thousands of peoples comments. Which isnt a criminal offense for a president to do. 30% approval score which he has is the backside for any president ever, and Clinton had a plenty bigger one then Bush's 30% throughout his tenure. Why are you even asking this question?

Answer 3

Presiding over peace and prosperity on the surface while serious problems fester unaddressed is not usually deemed an unqualified success. If that were the case, Franklin Pierce, James Buchanan, Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge would be counted among our best presidents. They clearly are not.

One president you DID mention, FDR, had a huge depression and a huge war on his watch. By your logic he would be one of our worst presidents.

The economy is doing at least as well now as during the Clinton years - check the statistics.

Everyone is against racism. Clinton talked big, but that's it.

The Republican congress spends far too much money, I agree.

Bush is addressing difficult problems, rather than kicking the can down the road as Clinton did.

Do you REALLY want us to withdraw and follow the policies of the 90s, which got us into the mess we're in? I honestly don't think people like you do. You don't like Bush and you don't like the war, so you complain about it, blame it all on Bush, and wish to turn back the clock to when we were blissfully ignorant of the threats against us. But deep down, if you examine the situation, you know you can't. (Also, Democrats who complain about surveillance programs, etc. should be asked to put up or shut up - vote on stopping the program or not!) I'm sure cancer patients would prefer to go back to the day before the cancer diagnosis, but a moment's rational reflection tells them that ignoring the problem doesn't "bring back the good times" - only facing the problem and fighting it gives any hope of a normal future. No, I'm not a mind reader. but I'm giving you my honest opinion.

Bush is not perfect. I'm listening to his press conference as I type, and he is terribly and embarrassingly articulate. But a "smooth talker" is not the most important thing we need. Actually, I voted at least once for each of Clinton and Bush. I if I had to choose who to lead us now, I'd pick Bush.

Answer 4

Clinton was essentially the better President. Though many people chastise his morals their true strife seems to be more about the fact that he lied about getting head in the Oval Office. Bush has not been President. He has been a shield for his administration, the corrupt guys and gals who actually are running the country. Clinton actually got down and did stuff because he was capable of doing it. Of the two options you have presented only one is actually carrying out a task, that was Clinton. That's an unfair question. Bush is too dumb to do anything good or bad, the things done in his name are actually not his fault. These are the horrors of a King completely dependent on his advisers.

Answer 5

There were 4 terrorists attacks against us that went unanswered. You are stupid and you are repeating some rhetorical talking points that are wrong. The lowest unemployment rate is right now. He had a balanced budget because he wasn't funding a war. Bush was the first person to appoint a black Secretary of State. Clinton was an immoral asshole and that is why Hillary can't win office; no one wants anything to do with Clinton anymore. Plus she is a shrill, shrewish, socialist, gay pandering, abortionist, butch ultra feminist. With all of your coherent sentences I bet you are a real champ at politics and current events mstimaya.

Answer 6

Clinton was definitely the better of the two, but it doesn't take much to be better than Bush. Oh, but Clinton cheaped out on national security and didn't respond to terrorism...yada yada yada. Newsflash: Until after 9-11 Bush didn't do anything about terrorism either. Recall that his defense priorities prior to 9-11 were dumping the SALT treaty and building balistic missile defense. People always say how Clinton did nothing about the Cole bombing, but that happened 3 months before Bush took office. He could have launched a retaliation his first day on the job, yet he didn't. The bottom line is that up until 9-11 terrorist actions were handled differently by everybody.
Other than that, what are their legacies...
Clinton: Welfare reform, probably the best 8 years of an economy you can have (admittedly some of it was due to a tech bubble), minor peacekeeping/wars/(whatever you'd like to call them they were cheap in $ and lives) in eastern europe, minor tax increases, then minor tax cut, ballanced budget, high dollar.
Bush: NCLB law, crappy economy from 02 to 04, better economy since, due in part to housing bubble, toughening of security after 9-11, huge defense buildup, tax cuts, Iraq war, large deficits, low dollar, fumbling of Katrina relief.

Probably not as extensive a list as I could have made, but as a young engineer, I would have been much better off graduating during the Clinton years. The country was in much better shape. A lot of bad things happened that aren't really either of their faults though.

Answer 7

During Clinton's admin it was the republicans who ran the house and thus they are responsible for the increases. Clinton never put a minority in any position higher than a secretary. Bush has not only put minorities in high profile positions but women as well. Clinton shamed the White House. The majority of Americans agree or Bush wouldn't have been re-elected by such an overwhelming majority. Repubs let the dems lull themselves into a false sense of security with all of their pro-Kerry polls but in the end it was the silent majority that took action. Like Liberal rhetoric talk is cheap and actions spoke louder than words.

Answer 8

No you are confused, Clinton was too weak to take the necessary steps to avoid the problems we are dealing with now. All of this was set into motiom long before Bush became president.
People need to open their eyes in this country, Bush is trying to clean up after other peoples messes.
If The previous administration done its job effectively we wouldn't be at this point.
Many in this country find it easier to open their mouths & complain instead of getting out and making a difference.
Loads of things can be accomplished in positive ways, all you have to do is take everything you hear from the media with a grain of salt, instead of seeing it as blind fact.
CT

Answer 9

Bush! Clintons the cause of 9-11

Answer 10

History will show you bush. Clinton came into the White house behind 12 years of Republican control. you always see results later.Clinton was so busy with Monica that he did not stop bin Laden.The economy was already going down hill,then 9-11 came and changed the world forever.Its good to have a real man in office that has the guts to defend our country.

Answer 11

We ended up in a Recession with Clinton, Jobs were going out of this at record rates. He addressed no national security. He sold our secret technology to China, He was brought up on charges of rape. He was impeached. And that is just the short list.

The obvious answer of course is President Bush is doing the better job.