Or was it a case of good riddance....
2006-09-15 03:07:39 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
Well, he has served England well, and remember his free kick vs. Greece which got them into World Cup 2002? However, his abilities are limited and he was never a true winger anyway.Although his deadball skills are tremendous,his overall contribution cannot be the same as Gerrard, Rooney or Lampard.
2006-09-15 09:03:43 · answer #1 · answered by dgnunis 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it was a case of good riddance We done rubbish in the world cup because he didnt play well n kept puking up on the field plus we have youngsters coming up that outclass beckham anyday anywhere
2006-09-15 11:47:37 · answer #2 · answered by bluenose123 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A case of good riddance.
2006-09-15 10:12:15 · answer #3 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good riddance.
2006-09-15 12:05:14 · answer #4 · answered by stj 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and No....Beckham has had his days of glory and has been fortunate in his career....England appear to be playing a far more cohesive game of tactics since David has not been around.
2006-09-15 15:14:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
David beckham is good at only free kicks.
he cannot defend, he cannot be a good slolid mid field or he can not play foward.
2006-09-15 17:03:43 · answer #6 · answered by emmanuelloarca 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
although i am not a fan of england..i was sad that beckham went great loss
2006-09-15 12:11:09 · answer #7 · answered by Herbicide 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He still has some abillity & exprience but there r many better players in England team.
2006-09-15 10:48:35 · answer #8 · answered by Aragorn98 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because all he has is the curling kick. England needed to cut the fat.
2006-09-15 10:27:00 · answer #9 · answered by Tony R 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm sad-honestly and i miss him actually.it's ok if mclaren put him as substitutes but he cut him from england squad?!that's pathetic..well,i wait for him to comeback..play for england..
2006-09-15 13:10:52 · answer #10 · answered by mrs lampard 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋