Religious leaders always have had some control over the political leadrs through religionnly. That is history. Political leadrs in ancient times exerted control through mite and men power . Religous leaders did not have might abd men power . But had brain power and knew the phschology of controllin g large groups of people . Political leaders needed the help of religou sleadrs . The religious leadres made good use of the politicl leaders to increase the number of their followers with the help of the state.
This what happend in the case of chritianity.Islam is not any diferent from chritianity. Chritianity taught peace and spread by violence and threat with state power through Holy crushade and Islam is fundamentally the same except that that it preaches violence against polythiests and killing them in one section (para 9 of chapter 29)and in another section it tells them , that you have your belief and I have my belief . It is a bundle of contadictions and and its inducement to the believer is a special first class lstay in an air-conditioned suite with sweet drinks in a five star hotel with a large number of damselves with big swelling breasts to enjoy ( specific scriptural description in the section 78 (an-naba Announcement ).
The scene of the heaven is as romantic reminds one
of Omar Khyam's in Rubiyaat -" Beneath the bow , with a cup of wine and and book of verse and thou beside me.etc ......)
The scritpture promisse such comfrots in after-life if the believer carries out the commands of the prophet .The firm belief of some of his followers who are fond of such pleasure in heaven goads them to violent ways and creates hell for themselves and for other innocent people , here in this world .
The goal of any religion must be to establish peace among the humans in this world and ensure the sfety abd happiness of the people whichevr religion they might belong to , but not to incite the followers to violence to create hell here for the believers themselvs and others in noway concerned with them also. How can suc a religon be relevant to the present times ? If the accusations of violence against it are not right why not the people concerned change the scriptures to remove the violent portions or make suitable declaration through the authorised Institutions and bodies to persuade the followers to give up vilonece in the name of religon.
vilonece in th ename of politics can always be handled effectively by dealing with the people engaging in violence .violence in th enme of religons complicates the action against the violators and affects the innocents people of the specific religion also . it is only with the specific nefarious intenetioin of involveing all the people of the particular religons that the terrorists commit violence in the name of violence taking advantage of the violent teachings in the scriptures .Those among the followers of the religons who want to uphold the image of the religon should understand the seriousness of the situation and take iprompt action toisolate the terrorists , in stead of playing into the hands of the terrorists in the name of religon and complaining against those who deal with the terrorists in the interest of their survival. The muslims can not think that the others should not exist and should convert to islam or die . They should think about it and understand the real cause of the trobule ,
No other religion seems to support terrorism.
In stead of creating a situation involving others , the muslims themselves set right the mideeds of the terrorists in the name of islam. Others will ake carre of theirs.
in inida , the there is no problem for themuslims .it is only pakistan that has been working for the disenchantment of the muslims against the inida government in order to grab the Kashmir terrtory. some misguided muslims and those of foreing origine are engaed in violence and in the processof the goenment dealing with the terrorists , the locxal muslim population suffers . this is what the pakistan muslims want .The people of gujarat ,including the muslims have realized the nefarious intention and acrtivities of the pakistan muslims and are now rising against the invaders .
There won't be any preoblem by the terrorists muslims once all sections of the muslim population come to realize who is responsible for the problems of muslims here .
Terrorism will be wioed out of Inida.once we tame Pakistan the international breeder and exporter of terrorism. the whole world has started realizing it and pakistan 's colour is fading and its true colour is exposing now .
2006-09-15 04:19:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Infinity 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it atleast gives a sense of nationalism, whenever a blast happens and ppl rushing out to help others, and it is one of few instances the nation gets a chance to feel "patriotic" get united. Never in history, terrorism has won and will win bcuz poeple will only develop hatred for terrorism and it will only make them even stronger. Terrorism can only win if people pressurize the govt to oblige them which is not going to happen when ppl are angry.
The beauty of why terror cannt win is ... Someone can lose thier loved ones only once. Before that, they dont seem to bother abt terrorism. At the time of loss, they grieve and they promise to avenge for thier loved ones. Soon, they come out of grieve. They have lost a loved one, they have come over it and got stronger. They know the pain and they know how to overcome it. And they are ready to face the next day. And how can terrorism except these ppl to surrender? They have just tightened a knot over thier own neck, as someone is "made" out there to avenge them.
I wont be surprised if few secret bodies, external to the government (are) will be formed out of this mass to bust out terror nests, if govt is not taking offensive strikes on them or attempt to assasinate those terror leaders hiding in other countries. And i wont be surprised if bollywood take this theme and make a movie, send the hero to the other side of border (for a change) and infiltrate thier camp and drop a chemical bomb and do a kamisakee .. no burst, no blood, so no UN enquiry :))
2006-09-15 09:37:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by AaRoN 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing will happen. Innocent people will die and the atrcious would survie. But people of India will not keep quite. There would be born another Gandhiji who would make India devoid of terrorist activities. Do not loose hopes. We have thrown the Britishers out. Same way the trrorists also would get eliminated. If hope are fears, all soldiers would die. But the spirit of India will live for ever.
2006-09-15 03:04:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Balu 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why this 'IF'. Terrorism is certainly going to increase by leaps and bounds, mainly from middle of October 2006 to end of 2007. If if increases more than your wildest imaginations, read my two interviews at www.voiceofambition.com. Then, probably you would believe in what I have said there.
2006-09-15 05:48:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by ASHOK GHAI 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Indians will some day learn to tackle terrorism, though they won't be able to finish it completely, it will be reduced. Alternatively the present terrorism will definitely end in world war III which seems to be around the corner.
2006-09-15 18:00:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by atulsonak001 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Terrorism does not affect any country in any way.People die everyday but the country moves on. People cry for a few minutes
but very soon they are again smiling and laughing.
2006-09-15 04:58:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by rajendran 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
wrst case scenario? IMO there are two possible sources of terrorism in india (apart of some crazy goons)- china and pakistan. If they manage to destabilize the country it will end up divided between these two
2006-09-15 03:07:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by cp_scipiom 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only 2 solutions are possible ultimately. Either both Indo-Pak leaders will realise to bring this to an end by establishing a foolproof mechanism or else there will be a WAR.
I am afraid,the later one is inevitable.I am sorry.
2006-09-15 04:49:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Indian 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Again India looses its freedom and goes into the hands of a foreign country
2006-09-15 04:30:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by gunti 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Reckless terrorism will lead our country towards a civil war and after that the long-awaited peace will come. Just like mahabharat.
2006-09-15 04:42:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
unquestionably terror in NE India is an inner rely - no different cnoutry in contact. in hassle-free terms some communities like Naxalites (i think of they're stated as Bodo militants) who'd pick to alter into self sustaining from and function a separate u . s . a . (merely like LTTE needs self sustaining Tamil u . s . a .). All are as much as dividing this u . s . a . into bits and products and our great sensible politicians are in hassle-free terms busy hatching eggs.
2016-10-15 00:46:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by mulry 4
·
0⤊
0⤋