Both?
2006-09-15 02:46:31 · 5 answers · asked by ? 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
He was a hero to many,but he went about in the wrong way. Like many throughout history,he used religion and violence to acheive his goals. I'll say this,he WAS a man of conviction.
2006-09-15 06:03:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A hero would be a very mild way to put it. Indeed a Hero if there ever was one. A Man of conviction he was. He knew right from wrong and acted upon his principles.
Read his speech to the court:
"In the first place, I deny everything but what I have all along admitted: of a design on my part to free slaves . . .
Had I interfered in the matter which I admit, and which I admit has been fairly proved . . . had I so interfered in behalf of the rich, the powerful, the intelligent, or the so-called great . . . and suffered and sacrificed, what I have in this intereference, it would have been all right. Every man in this Court would have deemed it an act worthy of reward rather than punishment.
I see a book kissed which I suppose to be the Bible, or at least the New Testament, which teaches me that all things whatsoever I would that men should do unto me, I should do even so to them. It teaches me further to remember them that are in bonds as bound with them. I endeavored to act up to that instruction. I say that I am yet too young to understand that God is any respecter of persons. I believe that to have interfered as I have done, as I have always freely admitted I have done in behalf of His despised poor, I dod no wrong, but right. Now if it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice and mingle my blood further with the blood of my children and with the blood of millions in this slave country whose rights are disregarded by wicked, cruel and unjust enactments, I say, let it be done. "
2006-09-15 10:12:16 · answer #2 · answered by LeBlanc 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
An overzealous murderer in a noble cause. Ends should not justify means.
2006-09-15 10:45:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both. Good intentions. Bad 'strategery'.
2006-09-15 10:02:30 · answer #4 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both. His intention was good, but his actions were not.
2006-09-15 13:55:47 · answer #5 · answered by bldudas 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋