English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've just had a conversation with one of my work colleagues regarding the Twin Towers 9/11 tradgedy. He explains that not is all what it seems. Does anybody have any thoughts on the matter?

2006-09-15 02:39:59 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

33 answers

Go to 911myths.com... it sets the conspiracy theories to bed. snopes.com does the same. Go to the 911 commission report for the bipartison results of their investigation. http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm

The photos have all been doctored and the false theories rely on ignoring all known science, physics and principles of engineering. The conspiracy theories have yet to turn up one scientifically provable fact.

2006-09-15 02:41:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items, (with serial numbers) plus security videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI immediately following each tragic episode.

With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. Regarding the planes that allegedly flew into the WTC towers, it is only just possible that heavy aircraft were involved in each incident, but no evidence has been produced that would add credence to the government's theoretical version of what actually caused the total destruction of the buildings, let alone proving the identity of the aircraft. That is the problem with the government's 911 story.

2006-09-15 03:30:37 · answer #2 · answered by axeldones 1 · 0 0

The theories are really people reaching for straws.
As far as jet fuel not burning hot enough....what do you think the temperature of a jets exhaust is?...any idea?
What the theorist are telling you is the ignition temperature of jet fuel.
The burn temperature is regulated by the amount of oxygen available.
I have personaly seen a wooden office structure burn inside a metal framed building and the beams bent like spaghetti...no really..they bent until they touched the floor and the beam was twenty feet up...That was with wood alone.
Look at all the eyewitness accounts of that day.
Did any...any of the theorist base there claims on eyewitness accounts?
There theories are based on hearsay,interpretation of words,and whatever little glitch or so called questionable video.
Most of their theories are based on things they know little about.
Flight 77 where is it?
It probably looked something like Flight 93..if youve seen the pictures you know what i am talking about.
Why didn't the towers act like other buildings that were hit by planes?There are no other buildings like the twin towers as far as construction...yet they use other buildings as compairisons.
Besides where was the primer cord?
And yes i know some will say...dude they used electronic detonation with a transmitter cause thats how Rambo does it.
Well they took a big chance..because primer cord is the standard because it's reliable and the precentage of undetonated charges is almost none whereas radio detonation is a crap shoot.
I urge you to research the answers the theorist have...really research..not just go to one of those sites and read a buncha crap.

2006-09-15 03:19:59 · answer #3 · answered by Dave 3 · 1 0

Has anyone ever seen, heard, any conclusions on these idiotic conspiracies?
Hell no.
All they do is ask questions.

All we hear is how stupid Bush is, what an imbecile he is, what an idiot he is, etc,etc,etc.

DUH! How was/is he so damned brilliant to put together 9/11, in 9 months?

He trained the terrorists to fly, put the whole plan together, planned for Flight 93 to hit the White House, then had the passengers crash the plane, so it wouldn't hit the White house. He had all the cell phone calls, with the passenger voices already on tape, so they could be falsified as calls from the plane.....

Holy Sh**. And Bush did this all alone, without any other help???

Does anyone have a brain anymore? Is everyone on LSD?


Geeezzzz!

2006-09-15 02:59:30 · answer #4 · answered by ed 7 · 1 0

The last question I saw on here that raised the conspiracy theory started 'If you take the flight number of the first plane to hit... U33...' The halfwit couldn't even be bothered to check the theory against some of the simplest facts - that was NOT the flight number of any of the planes involved (nor indeed is it a flight number of ANY flight in the world)..... Thankfully that question was removed. However it IS true that aliens have Kennedy's brain, that Abraham Lincoln was killed by an enraged Smurf and that Paul McCartney died during the making of Abbey Road (and was replaced in the Beatles by a very young Keith Flint, subsequently of the Prodigy).

2006-09-15 03:19:48 · answer #5 · answered by eriverpipe 7 · 1 0

What I truly question is WTC 7 coming down with all the evidence in it. Until today it remains a mystery while all other can be explained,in a good way or bad way, that doesn' t matter. How on earth could WTC 7 come down without a plane hitting it. I haven't seen or heard any scientific explanation for that fact. Everybody seemed to be talking about the Twin Towers on that horrible day while seven hours later, out of nowhere a third building collapses. I haven't seen any news reports on that, on the spot, no people talking about that either, as if it were normal that an entire building comes down like that.

2006-09-15 02:51:30 · answer #6 · answered by Avatar13 4 · 0 2

Think about what it would take to actually pull of this conspiracy. How many people would need to be involved? How could they get all of those explosives into the building without anyone noticing? And why did the plane crash in Shanksville, PA? I'm assuming that's part of it as well.

Do you think that the thousands of people that would be needed to pull off this kind of trick could all keep quiet? Do you really believe that not a single one of them would have a little pang of guilt and come forward with the truth?

We all watched this LIVE on TV. People in NYC saw the planes hit the buildings - in person - no camera tricks. Are they all in on the joke as well?

Elvis is dead. We landed on the moon. And 9-11 was caused by Islamic terrorists crashing planes into buildings.

2006-09-15 02:48:34 · answer #7 · answered by FozzieBear 7 · 1 0

I often answer these Q because Ive seen an amazing DVD documentary that really gets you thinking and asking Q's There seems to be alot of reliable evidence to suggest that there was a conspiracy and that the US government know more than they let on. There also seems to be too many coincidences to let that event happen.

All I will say is watch the DVD and judge for yourself.

Its "The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw - THE GREAT CONSPIRACY" & " confronting the evidence - painful deceptions"

or go to www.reopen911.org

2006-09-15 02:48:07 · answer #8 · answered by 90210 aka Hummer Lover 6 · 0 2

Yes Iv,e Plenty of thoughts on it and I don,t believe any of the Pissed up Pub Theories that there was or has been a Conspiracy , It only takes one Nutter with a Nudge Nudge , Wink Wink ,to make himself look as if he "Knows" something to set the Ball Rolling.

2006-09-16 07:17:09 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

Well it must be the Israeli's or george bush, coz last time I tried
to burn a 110 story building with aviation fuel in a building test it
was still standing.
I am sure you should get some more answers so you don't have to brew up again

2006-09-15 03:29:57 · answer #10 · answered by manc1 1 · 0 0

The towers collapsed because the metal structure frame work melted.

Oh, and cause some political/religious fanatics rammed a passenger jet into each one.

2006-09-15 02:51:14 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers