2006-09-15 00:44:07 · 20 answers · asked by ram s 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
I think Harbhajan is a better choice. His "doosra" is his main weapon.
2006-09-18 20:01:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ya that's for sure kumble is much experienced than harbhajan
and can play well in matches as a all rounder
2006-09-15 07:47:01 · answer #2 · answered by tonz_speed 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why are you just pick out the players who are not playing well for a short time?
I think the both are the players who give a face to Indian cricket.
2006-09-15 12:12:55 · answer #3 · answered by Hawkiteagle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
powar is a better chice..in ODIs..h can contain the batsman...kumble is a wicket taker..but can go 4 runs...but harbhjan is not useful in ODIs
2006-09-15 07:52:44 · answer #4 · answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are they cricketers? I thought they were television stars or something because i see them a lot in the televison advertisements but hardly on the cricketing field.
2006-09-15 07:47:02 · answer #5 · answered by The Inquisitive 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both are equally good players and it depends on the situation of the match on the basis of which we should select whom to play.
2006-09-15 08:27:56 · answer #6 · answered by TUSHAR 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes,Kumble is better.
2006-09-15 08:37:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on pitch
2006-09-15 08:09:53 · answer #8 · answered by Sekhar K 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both should be played
2006-09-16 01:11:26 · answer #9 · answered by rajan naidu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure
2006-09-15 07:49:59 · answer #10 · answered by VIKRAM 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋