Did the US government order the hit on the twin towers?

Question

How did 6 tons of titainium(the jet engines) totally dissapear from the pentagone....??...my brain is hurting trying to work this one out.

Juble....explain to me how a plane with a wing span of over 100feet leaves a hole 25 feet wide?...how only 1 small piece of the ''planes'' fuselage...1 rotor from a turbine...and NOTHING ELSE of the plane was found ?...till you can answer that 4 me...i think ill give the yellow bus a miss.

some of you guys really need to look at the hard facts of what actually happened on 9/11, your obviously uninformed, Google up.

Answer 1

That is the most likely conclusion of any lengthy research.
The official 9/11 Conmission report is so full of holes, lies and ambiguities that only a mis-informed person could believe it.
So, there is obviously a cover-up taking place, which points to an inside job.
The reason no large jet engines were found, at any of the so-called crash sites, is that there were no large jets, and hence no hijackers.

Answer 2

There are several consipiracy theories generated in the US about the 9/11 attacks. I can't really understand why the US government won't launch a fully independent investigation into those terrible events. Anyone who has gone to school would know that aircraft fuel is not enough to melt steel. I am not a scientist, but experts should investigate. It seems reckless for a great nation such as the US simply point the finger on Al Queda and attack Afganistan, an investigation would have seemed more productive in the War on Terror. But I think that dimwitt in the White House only philosophy is to "shoot first, talk later". This attitude can't get anywhere. The Bush Administration is being idealogical rather than practical, and this can be very dangerous. Peace.

Answer 3

As much as I dislike Bush, I can't believe he or anyone in our government order such an action. I just have trouble believing that. Of course it is possible but no matter what, we will never know it if its true. Not even if the Senate and Congressmen and women were to discover it. Those in the Top Secret war room would never let anything like that out to general knowledge. It would create general distrust in the government and a civil war could be the result. Just like the JFK murder. We probably will never know the truth.

Answer 4

No, these conspiracy theories about the government attacking itself so that it could start a war are TOO far fetched. It's actually quite appalling. I'm not American and have to affiliation to either political party. Regardless of whether there are war-hawks in Bush's inner circle, any plan to attack itself is ridiculous.

Bush, Rumsfeld and especially Cheney have immensely profited from the war in Iraq and Afganistan. Their decisions are perhaps motivated by based on greed and power. They are all very wealthy. To come up with a plan to attack your own country would mean risking all your wealth, your reputation, and destroy your family name for generations to come as one of the greatest mass murders of all time. They wouldn't risk that.

Answer 5

You asked about the twin towers but then in the details you are asking about the Pentagon. What the heck are you really asking here? Oh yea, I have the answer now! The spell check icon is on top of this box on the right hand side! And that's my final answer.

Answer 6

Do all of us a favor; give your brain a rest, catch the little yellow bus in front of your house and go to finger painting class you frickin' half-wit.

Answer 7

I doubt it. The political fallout involved if anyone found out.....it would make a scandal like Watergate look like a joke

Answer 8

Yes, it was the branch of government that has been taken over by space aliens. Space people get bitchy at times.
(I'll bet your brain is hurting.)
Conspiracy jokes are getting funnier.

Answer 9

You've been watching 'Loose Change' huh? Oh dear...how the producers of that 'video' must be laughing all the way to the bank at the naivety of some people. Anyhow, let's get this straight. LOTS of wreckage of the commercial plane was found at the Pentagon. (Google the images yourself). The Pentagon's exterior was built specifically to withstand high explosive attacks (makes sense, no?). Hence why the hole was so small. 'Loose Change' also claims 757's only have Pratt & Whitney engines made of steel and titanium alloy, when in fact the engines used in Flight 77 are Rolls-Royce engines, made from a wide variety of different materials. Bollyn, the American Free Press reporter who 'Loose Change' references as their 'expert' got the incorrect information from a factory in Indiana which makes engines for smaller aircraft; rather than the companies in Quebec and Derby that overhaul the 757 engines. Plus, think about it, any other plane crash in the world would involve the pilot trying to PREVENT the plane hitting a building. Here, the idea WAS to hit it. Go search at www.youtube.com for images of plane crashes, and I assure you that those that involve deliberate destructive testing of planes results in very little of the plane remaining. Every professional journalist in DC reported that ALL witnesses who saw the attack saw a commercial plane - big, full of people - fly across the sky and hit the Pentagon. I will agree that it has been hard to see photos of the attack on the Pentagon seconds after the plane hit, but, quite rightly that's because those people who were fried alive have relatives who remain alive, and, would you want to see parts of your loved ones scattered everwhere being roasted? Security cameras everywhere in the world use a 'fish-eye' lens for wide angle coverage. But, it means peripheral images become distorted and 'reduce' (look in a spoon). So, something like a large plane would appear at the periphery as something less than its real size. If the US government wanted to do this to justify a war in Iraq and Afghanistan, why were the people involved Saudis? A state friendly to the US. While you were wasting your time watching 'Loose Change', you clearly chose not to see the Al_Jazeera film of Bin Laden with the hijackers?

As for the Twin Towers, clearly the makers of 'Loose Change' are pretty sharp users of video technology, no? Is it therefore beyond the bounds of reason to say that, using that video technology, they superimposed images of 'controlled explosions' around the oustide of the buiilding? Contrary to what that video claims, they are many many MANY professionally recorded accounts by architects and engineers of skyscrapers falling due to the 'pancake effect' after fire or explosion. Typically, like the Twin Towers, they have happened at 85% of freefall speeds. (Google this too).

As for the remaining plane that crashed in the woods, Loose Change quotes the local coroner, Wally Miller, as saying that he 'saw no bodies' in that plane. Then, later in the video, the makers say 'Coroner Miller was able to identify 12 of the bodies from dental records'. Huh?

There is also an interview of chief flight instructor Marcel Bernard focusing on the weaknesses of Hani Hanjour's flying skills when he took lessons at Freeway Airport; however, it fails to clarify Bernard's expert opinion to the 9/11 inquiry on Hanjour's ability to hit the Pentagon. "There's no doubt in my mind that once that [hijacked jet] got going, he could have pointed that plane at a building and hit it."

There is no exploration on the effect of fire on unprotected structural steel, which, as any Google search will show you, loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F. Kevin Ryan the "expert" source that 'Loose Chage' quotes from Underwriters Laboratories for steel certification is actually a non-expert from a subsidiary for water testing.

The suggestion in 'Loose Change' that $167 billion in gold was stored in vaults beneath the World Trade Center was very easily debunked as it exceeded the entire amount of U.S. gold reserves by approximately $67 billion. However, the "$230 million in precious metals" stored at the WTC complex were in fact recovered safely.

The French documentary film makers, the Naudet Brothers, threatened to sue the makers of 'Loose Change' for taking the images they (the Naudet Brothers) had used in their own documentary, 9/11, and distorting them for alternative purposes.

Before the release of the second version of 'Loose Change' its producer, Korey Rowe, said, “We know there are errors in the documentary, and we’ve actually left them in there so that people discredit us and do the research for themselves.” Well, that's good to know, huh? Would that be like me saying, 'I was fired from my job because my CV contains nothing but lies, and so, my employer should not complain if he finds out I lied to get the job?' Really...how dim.

Have you ever seen any interviews on internationally renowned and reputable news services (BBC, Reuters, CNN etc) with the makers of the 'Loose Change' video? No? Now, stop and think, why might that be?

I could go on...but, in a nutshell, you are reacting to what other people with a separate agenda want you to believe. With respect, wise up, and stop being a reactionary. Nature gave you a good brain...so, use it for original thinking.

Thanks for asking your question, and take care.

Answer 10

I don't think so. Titanium issue...the planes had to fly ! The gov. may have shot down the PA.
flight !