English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Yes, if we think of his way of protests.
No, if we think of the other freedom strugglers

2006-09-16 06:14:44 · answer #1 · answered by Antsan 2 · 0 0

i would say he was in some way indirectly responisable, as he had publicity on his side, and he made the British look bad and the Monarcy look selfish. so more as a PR exercise but hey it worked (on the British side not Ganhdi).

2006-09-15 00:56:03 · answer #2 · answered by azmondo 3 · 0 0

yes... by non-violent protest... he inspired millions of indians to do the same... trade was runied.. look up 'salt tax'

2006-09-15 00:03:30 · answer #3 · answered by torriniaveri 1 · 0 0

Co - exist , that would be too easy.

2006-09-14 23:45:53 · answer #4 · answered by Chad M 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers