No they should apply for a proper licence and not one obtained from a Rice Crispies packet!!!!
2006-09-14 23:14:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dragon Empress 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
They should get banned for drink driving cos its they're fault but to enforce harsher sentances for the fact the person has a mullet is injustifiable. The person is simply trying to bring back the 80's and I'm all for that....rock on brother!!!!
One question - are you going bald Ram to ask this question? Perhaps I indicate some sort of jealousy!!!
2006-09-15 03:18:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Fawkes 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, but not just for drink driving. It should be an absoloute offence with a mandatory 10yr sentence. That includes the female 2 tone Tina Turner version, too.
2006-09-14 23:13:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by lickintonight 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the U.S., drunk drivers kill many people. Sober homosexuals, hairdressers and "scousers", on the other hand, are far less likely to drive and kill. Personally, I believe we should have public WHIPPINGS for drunk driving. ( I'm joking, ram.)
2006-09-14 23:21:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
YEs and you should be severely punished for drunk E-mailing this
2006-09-14 23:11:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
why dont you try asking a sensible question
2006-09-14 23:35:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by mentor 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, you probably should have, so consider yourself lucky this time.
2006-09-14 23:14:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by bonzo the tap dancing chimp 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
it's DRUNK driving - and as to your question, no, of course not, whatever brought up this question?
2006-09-14 23:12:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Walter W. Krijthe 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol yeah!
2006-09-14 23:11:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by footballgrl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋