English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or minorities who are fighting back should be termed terrorist because they are an "unlawful" entity

2006-09-14 22:23:39 · 4 answers · asked by a b 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

4 answers

Terrorism Perpetrators aka Terrorists

Acts of terrorism can be carried out by individuals, groups, or states. According to some definitions, clandestine or semi-clandestine state actors may also carry out terrorist acts outside the framework of a state of war. The most common image of terrorism is that it is carried out by small and secretive cells, highly motivated to serve a particular cause. However, many of the most successful operations in recent time, such as 9/11, the London underground bombing, and the 2002 Bali bombing were planned and carried out by a close clique, comprised of close friends, family members and other strong social networks. These groups benefited from the free flow of information, and were able overcome the obstacles they encountered where others failed due to lack of information and communication. Over the years, many people have attempted to come up with a terrorist profile to attempt to explain these individuals' actions through their psychology and social circumstances. Others, like Roderick Hindery, have sought to discern profiles in the propaganda tactics used by terrorists.

Terrorist groups
Most organisations that are accused of being a "terrorist organization" will deny using terrorism as a military tactic to achieve their goals, and there is no international consensus on the bureaucratic definition of terrorism. Therefore, this list is of organisations that are, or have been in the past, proscribed as "terrorist organizations" by other organizations, including the United Nations and national governments, where the proscription has a significant impact on the group's activities.

*Religious
*Nationalistic
*Anarchists
*Ethnic
*Ecologist (includes Animal and Environmental causes)

State sponsors
A state can sponsor terrorism by funding a terrorist organization, harboring terrorism, and also using state resources, such as the military, to directly perform acts of terrorism. State-sponsored terrorism is widely denounced by the international community. When states do provide funding for groups considered by some to be terrorist, they rarely acknowledge them as such. For example, United States has been linked to a number of organizations, but maintains that where funds have been transferred, these have been legitimate.

2006-09-14 22:33:51 · answer #1 · answered by torreyc73 5 · 4 1

2 substantial reasons are supplies, relatively oil and water. however the biggest clarification for the wars interior the midsection East is by way of the fact all the Arab international locations % one particular piece of actual belongings which in straightforward terms catches their interest because's out of their attain: Israel, in the past conventional as Canaan--the Promised Land. Israel lies on the western end of the Fertile Crescent and is for this reason good agricultural land. Agriculture is substantial, yet you will think of that with in the present day's marketplace, those in different aspects of the midsection East could be completely content cloth with their oil. yet they % Israel. no longer because of the fact it has nutrition, yet because of the fact they are able to't have it. It does no longer belong to them. The Arab Muslims are like a spoiled newborn who has been showered with high priced presents all his life, yet who remains jealous because of the fact his brother gained a single heirloom from their father. He needs to declare what the daddy gave the brother and make it his very own, yet he's likewise no longer approximately to enable go of all that he's been given. And he's better than prepared to kick his brother to the shrink or maybe kill him if that's what it takes to get what he needs.

2016-11-07 09:09:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

A terrorist's aim is to cause terror - plenty of states - of all ideologies cause terror.

Margaret Thatcher and other Conservatives used to describe Nelson Mandela as a terrorist - which says an awful lot more about them than him.

States can cause terror through fear - the US does this to its own citizens through the 'war on terror' and has committed many acts of terror in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East and Africa - just look at who it propped up during the Cold War.

2006-09-14 22:37:00 · answer #3 · answered by Ben H 2 · 1 1

I guess the first thing you need to figure out is
a) what is a terrorist. Use a dictionary.
b) stop trying to stir up trouble using the whole "minority" thing

Other than that... why not put some of your energy into sincerely trying to make this world a better place.

2006-09-14 22:29:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers