Someone who had military experience and could lead the United States out of war or another inexperienced draft evader who knows nothing about being Commander in Chief, but has a bloodthirsty quest to prove something?
2006-09-14 22:10:18 · 7 answers · asked by Sidoney 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
So Charles, am I correct in saying you would vote against someone who has knowledge in combat, defensive and offensive decisions, vs someone who is befuddled at best and is left with dithering old men with a huge stake at seeing the bulk of mankind diminished to ripen their stakes in the companies they are partnered with? Just checking...
2006-09-14 22:29:41 · update #1
Wowsa, you woke up MAD this morning, didn't you?
But that's okay, because I admire that quality in people...
...especially when there's so much about which to BE mad.
And that lying, cheating, thieving, cowardly Big Fool in the White House is more than enough cause to make the whole world wake up mad.
Well, you've certainly cheered me up! Righteous indignation makes for great morning exercise!
2006-09-15 01:39:31 · answer #1 · answered by St. Hell 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you think voting in people like John Kerry or John McCain would make them a better president because they have a served in the military would make them a better Commander in Chief you better have your head examined. Just because McCain was a POW doesn't make him a more qualified then any one else, and as far as Kerry goes that is something else. Can you believe him and his military record? I certainly can't.
Any president picks his military commanders from a list of officers along with assistance from his cabinet. In a lot of cases they are picked by preference of knowing them. The Commander in Chief has to rely on those people to make the right decisions. As the Commander in Chief he has to take all responsibility for any decision's those people make so he has got to be extra careful or he sits in a hot seat such as our president today does.
Our president today is taking blame for a lot of things because he has picked or has chosen the wrong people for high level positions, and he is suffering for it.
I personally think every man should have to serve at least two years of military service, if just to make a man out of him but it certainly doesn't qualify him to be the Commander in Chief.
2006-09-16 04:27:39 · answer #2 · answered by AL 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will like to vote for the person who already had Military Experience.... bcoz he is a well experienced, hardworker, n more over a disciplined candidate,...... n he also very intelligent and think technically, and aslo has the ability to lead his country in a disciplined manner n in a right way.... without leading to any corruptions, scams, n more over in the country....
datz it..!!!
2006-09-15 05:42:03 · answer #3 · answered by rockie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i´d vote for s o with military experience who would lead us out of this war in a way that the world would look at us with respect again!
2006-09-15 06:10:07 · answer #4 · answered by Lizzy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would definitely pick the spineless bastard. That way every country that hated us could f*ck with us whenever they wanted.
2006-09-15 05:20:59 · answer #5 · answered by Charles Lee Ray 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would, you would, but all these things didn't seem to matter in the last elections.
2006-09-15 05:18:49 · answer #6 · answered by Deep Thought 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yea sure
2006-09-15 05:17:59 · answer #7 · answered by Pauli :) 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋