Pluto and astrology?

Question

Who will be effected and how will they be appeased by the removal of pluto from astrologers list of planets. I need to rely on your correct answers to get through life today

Answer 1

Pluto was found recently. so original Indian astrology does not mention it's effect. Later on astrologers were studying the effects, but very littile is known. So it does not effect according to original Indian astrology.

Answer 2

Classical, traditional, and medieval Astrologers do not use the outer planets: Uranus, Neptune and Pluto in their delineations, modern Astrologers utilize them. The traditionalists still practicing today will continue to ignore the outer planets in their delineations, just as they have always done.

Whether or not Pluto is classified as planet or not is irrelevant to modern practitioners of Astrology. The qualities associated with Pluto: power, control, transformation and the destroying or reforming urge, are still applicable whether it is called a planet or an ice dwarf.

Astrologers know from studying charts for 76 years, since Pluto's discovery, that Scorpio is co-ruled by Mars and Pluto. That will not change.

Astrologers use other bodies (not just planets) in our calculations, such as asteroids. Ceres, an asteroid, one of the bodies they may call a planet, already is in use by modern Astrologers. Other asteroids currently being used are Juno, Pallas, and Vesta. Chiron, a centaur, is also extensively in use. Chiron is believed to be ruled by Virgo. Non-planetary bodies can be ruled or in dignity by one of the 12 zodiac signs. Another example of that is the lunar nodes. In Western Astrology, the North Node is Exalted in Gemini and the South Node is Exalted in Sagittarius. The North Node is in Fall in Sagittarius and the South Node is in Fall in Gemini.

It makes do difference as to what Pluto is categorized as, planet, ice dwarf, or whatever the astronomers come up with as a classification system, the characteristics associated with it still stand.

Answer 3

This is the whole problem with astrology. Astrology is a whole bunch of crap. And to answer to those who say Pluto did not go anywhere and so it should still be a planet, let me answer. Pluto has not gone anywhere but it is now discovered to be part of a group of little Pluto-like rocks, called the Keiper belt. This is why we have to eleminate Pluto as a planet. If we include Pluto, then we would have to call all the rocks in the Keiper Belt a planet.

Answer 4

According to the press release by "Union of World Astrologers and other Con-man", everyone who was born in July 17th as well as everyone who was born in 1930 and everyone who was born at 6:32 am will be affected. The effects will be either going bankrupt or getting rich or staying about the same. Also, some of these people will be very successful in their love lives, but some other will find themselves very very lonely. Unfortunately there is no telling of which one in advance. Everyone who was not born at times listed above will continue their lives as usual, i.e. nothing will happen to them until further notice from their astrologers.

Answer 5

It won't have any effect at all. Scientific studies have shown that there's no correlation whatsoever between astrological signs and the stuff that those signs are supposed to predict.

In other words: astrology is nonsense. If there's any rigorous scientific study that shows otherwise, I have yet to hear of it.

Answer 6

Pluto is still there. It didn't go anywhere. They are calling it a dwarf planet now. So that is still a planet, right?

Answer 7

Nobody will be effected for it is still there. Astrology is an ancient Babylonian religion

Answer 8

It all confuses me. If it was a planet, it should still be a planet! It didn't go anywhere...