If there was a fight between James T. Kirk of Star Trek, Han Solo of Star Wars and Malcolm Reynolds of Serenity/Firefly, who would win?
I think Mal would win because he has very little honour and is just a down-right dirty fighter.
2006-09-14 19:34:33 · 25 answers · asked by Knight-wing 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I agree. But then Mal has had to fight, he was involved in a war. Where as Han Solo as a smuggler, is used to avoiding it. He has had to operate under the noses of the Empire and cope with the legions of Jabba the Hut. Kirk is a good captain and led by example, but has had the rules of the prime directive in-stiled into him. Mal, I think would do whatever it took to survive and protect those he cares for.
2006-09-14 22:18:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't get your high-waters in a wad, but in a battle of captains I don't think any of the ones you named would win. Reach into your pocket protector and grab a mechanical pencil to re-figure this one with. The ultimate captain is of course Crunch. None of your captains even know how to find the island of booberries. Think about it, Captain Crunch is the ONLY cereal character to be armed. Despite the peace crazed parental movement, Crunch has kept his saber and somehow escaped criticism. And do you want to talk about a dirty fighter? Crunch is insidious. He lures you in with his hollow promise of sugary goodness then he cuts the crap out of the roof of your mouth with his jagged edged cereal. James T. Kirk, Han Solo, and Malcolm Reynolds all are bound by the shortcomings of being live actors, but the Crunchmeister is a cartoon, which means he can do ANYTHING! I'm afraid your captains are all soggy.
2006-09-14 19:49:49 · answer #2 · answered by YahooGuru2u 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Han Solo definatly. Kirk is way to concerned with honor and life to be a seriouse threat. Han is brave but still very killed and smart. He has just enough honor not to be a villian but little enough that he is a seriouse threat. He is an amazing pilot, and also exelent at gun and fist fighting. But his biggest advantage is his quick wit, his abillaty to think fast on the spot.
2006-09-15 10:08:15 · answer #3 · answered by Han Solo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mal would totally win, he is the only one who is a veteran of hand to hand combat in a war. Han solo would have a hold-out blaster and Kirk well he's just cheesy!
2006-09-14 19:39:20 · answer #4 · answered by rswdew 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has to be the Mighty James Tiberius Kirk the good and bold always win Han Solo cant even stop himself being frozen and as for Mal DONT GET ME STARTED!!!!!!!!!!
2006-09-14 20:00:38 · answer #5 · answered by Keith B 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Despite my first instinct to say Solo once I thought about it I'd have to say Kirk. In every fight I've ever seen him have he has always come out on top despite the fact that he has been facing creatures from places where no other man has ever boldly gone. Mere mortals wouldn't stand a chance.
2006-09-14 22:22:27 · answer #6 · answered by Bal H 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Captain Crunch.
2006-09-14 19:38:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely James t kirk wins on his manners alone.
2006-09-15 03:41:41 · answer #8 · answered by pixie007 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Garry. The facts sound the most likely and realistic. How can you blame the man for wanting to make his wife healthy? Jay wants to get his siblings back, but since the family is poor, it is unlikely that the Northern soldiers would hold them hostage for ransom. And Kansas is a murderer. He should not profit from his own wrongdoing.
2016-03-27 02:02:32 · answer #9 · answered by Sandra 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
agree 100% besides Kirk and Solo are past it in their last films!
2006-09-14 20:16:47 · answer #10 · answered by break 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋