English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am a believer that you cannot fight an idea such as the war on terror or the war on drugs. I would just like to hear what others think.

2006-09-14 19:06:59 · 14 answers · asked by smilestoomuch 3 in Politics & Government Government

Oh good lord, I do not hate America. I love this country.

2006-09-14 19:11:50 · update #1

14 answers

The "War on Terror" isn't something that can be won. Terrorism is an idea, and ideas are bulletproof.

2006-09-14 19:10:33 · answer #1 · answered by Roland D. 2 · 2 1

Of course we can win the war on terror or any other war. All that is necessary is the requisite political will. We have all the weapons we'll ever need. The problem arises from the the vey term "war on terror". It is misleading. What we are at war with is not terrorism, which is nothing more than a tactic, we are at war with islamic jihadism, which is a movement. Kill its leaders and decimate its soldiers and you win the war. Isn't that how we beat other movements like nazism and japanese imperialism?

2006-09-14 21:31:47 · answer #2 · answered by caesar x 3 · 1 2

I believe so, if one is willing to use sufficient violence to achieve that goal. That is what the Crusades were for - to eliminate Islamist invaders from Europe and reduce their numbers to the point that they could no longer pose a threat. For a long time, it succeeded.

I believe turntable is correct that if Muslims stood up to Muslims it could be helpful - however, I do not think that Muslims, given the choice of living under Muslim law or 'sinful' Western laws, would fight to prevent the imposition of their own faith as the ruling law.

I'm just being realistic here. This reality is not pretty.

2006-09-14 19:15:48 · answer #3 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 2 0

you won't have the ability to, a minimum of no longer via militarily would on my own. i'm no longer a pacifist, yet you won't have the ability to win a war on what a individual makes a decision to do at any any given 2nd in time. The term "war on Terror" is merely undeniable stupid. i be attentive to the right thank you to have a war on a rustic, yet how are you able to've a war on an action? The "war on drugs" is yet another stupid term. The "war on XYZ" is in basic terms a slogan it relatively is hassle-free to sell to simpletons who have no extreme thinking skills. it relatively is merely an excuse for GW to get the great funds $ he needs to maintain our militia and private contractors over there. via the way, I artwork with a girl who has a son there as a contractor that works alongside the warriors networking computers. She mentioned he makes over 150K for doing the precise comparable ingredient by using fact the warriors who make approximately 25K. a lot for that LIE that categorical human beings make with reference to the internal maximum sector continually being so a lot extra effective and competitively priced than the government. yet, I digress. yet, there is a thank you to get the better hand in this. yet, it extremely is merely no longer politically appropriate. and that's via infiltarating the mosques with spies and insect the crap out of each and all of the places the place the inciters assemble. locate out who they are and then 86 'em. additionally, make it so the kinfolk of the guy who blew themselves up has to reimburse the victims. And in the event that they might't, they unfastened each and everything. Their domicile, vehicles, $, their little ones are taken away to be "re-knowledgeable". additionally, they might desire to take the remains of the bomber or terrorist and place them contained in the sewer device, so as that they won't get a "ideal" burial. ultimately, they might desire to make it a dying sentance crime to sell or glorify the terrorists interior the rustic of Iraq. do no longer you merely love the crap that GW positioned us in. What a moron. I constructive desire the Republican celebration can furnish us an more advantageous candidate next time. I keep in mind Hanity saying how undesirable it would be to get Kerry. properly, i do no longer see how he would have completed any worse. Infact, I in all probability would vote for him if I knew what I do now. All that $ spent would have bailed out social risk-free practices in all probability many cases over.

2016-09-30 23:40:15 · answer #4 · answered by armiso 4 · 0 0

you cant win what doesn't exist. This "War" was created by Bush for his own or party agenda. That's not to say that terrorists dont exist, they do. But if you listen to the fear machine, you'd think they're at our back doors. People need to understand Terrorism. An act of terrorism is usually a single catastrophic event to strike fear in a peoples mind that work to their advantage. They dont ever have to do anything on that scale again because the fear exists for another attack. 9-11 was a horrible tragic event that should've held someone accountable but he was allowed to get away because Bush wanted his war in Iraq, It seems Bushes desire for oil out weighs the pain of a nation.

2006-09-14 19:31:26 · answer #5 · answered by rgbear38 2 · 2 3

As Monty Python's Terry Jones put it, 'How can you have a war on an abstract noun??'

But really, it's more a political device for Bushco to keep everyone afraid. Fear=support. It probably has a little to do with the military industrial complex Eisenhower warned everyone about.

2006-09-14 20:01:29 · answer #6 · answered by tiko 4 · 1 2

It is hard to fight the war on terror if we have liberals and left wings complaining about every little detail of how to win this war. It is hard to win if the republicans, law enforcement, and military are constantly being told not to take action or afraid to do something for fear of loss of votes or popularity. It is hard to win the war against terror, if our military men are being put in jail for shooting back at our enemies. Or our border defense men getting arrested for shooting back at illegals for trying to get in our country... ILLEGALLY! Letting Hezbollah terrorists and others just waltz right into our country! Liberals do not know how to fight other people, they would rather try and talk to the very people that fly planes into our buildings, they would rather be peaceful and give terrorists rights, but not our military men, that defend us every day and night! The republicans need to focus on our borders, need to let our military do their job of destroying our enemies.

Strong government, strong military, strong borders, and strong laws. Not rights to the very people we know are illegal, not rights to the very people that want to blow us up, blow your children up, destroy our country! Profile, phone tap, do whatever it takes to catch these terrorists!

2006-09-14 19:24:46 · answer #7 · answered by Fallen 6 · 2 3

you can not win a war at any cost. but you can do act good to be knwon as a success person in life.

2006-09-14 19:19:37 · answer #8 · answered by OrangeApple 5 · 0 2

haha, yes but it would probably involve texas splitting off and becoming the world superpower as well as changing the english language to accommodate words like "malfeeance" and "subliminable".

2006-09-14 19:12:01 · answer #9 · answered by ubiquitousmee 2 · 2 2

yes..of course it can be won...but it will take more than fire power, it will take Muslims standing up to Muslims...as far as the hatred...people will always hate who is number one...

2006-09-14 19:15:43 · answer #10 · answered by turntable 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers