Fred Barnes, Weekly Standard appeared on Fox to discuss his recent meeting with President Bush in the Oval Office. The important news: “bin Laden doesn’t fit with the administration’s strategy for combating terrorism.” Bush told Barners that capturing bin Laden is “not a top priority use of American resources.”
2006-09-14 18:48:38 · 17 answers · asked by murphy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush and his cabinet right now are just doing damage control....and a very bad job of it. What they are doing is playing all sides so they don't completely lose control. Its all politics with elections coming up. I don't know if Osama is dead or alive and i'm pretty sure the government is lying to us so I don't know if we ever will. I just find it funny that George W. has agreed to help all countries fight terrorism but when there are terrorist acts in other coutries he turns his back and tells them to deal with it themselves because we are too busy fighting in one place we belong and in another place that we shouldn't be to begin with.
2006-09-14 18:55:01 · answer #1 · answered by smilestoomuch 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
He says that because if Bush did catch Bin Ladin, the war would be over. There would be no need for us to war against anyone or any nation. That's not part of Bushes plan. He wants to keep the war machine going so he can finish robbing us blind and lining his pockets along with his cronies. The war was a farce to begin with. You dont declare war on a country that had nothing to do with 9-11 or posed any threat to the US. You go after the man responsible for it who was in Afghanistan and allowed to get away. Again, because then Bush could justify a war in Iraq. I believe that the US knows exactly where he is and wont bring him in until the Bush Agenda is completed. Id say Republican Agenda but even they're distancing themselves from him. Fight by the sword, die by the sword. Bin Laden will be brought in when a democrat takes over, you watch.
2006-09-14 19:12:50 · answer #2 · answered by rgbear38 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Osama is not the only terrorist leader out there. Some others are far more active and need catching just as badly. Osama is not an operational director, he is more of a figurehead. He will be just as much a nuisance as a martyr as a zealot hiding in a cave.
What I find odd is that Democrats insist 'more of the same' is not desirable, then when Bush focuses attention on more immediate threats they claim he is 'indecisive'. Trust Democrats to lack any rational, cohesive position.
I couldn't help noticing the close financial ties between the Bin Ladens and certain Democrats...
2006-09-14 18:52:23 · answer #3 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush had a prior schedule to take out Saddam, and used the 9/11 attack for that reason. That conflict, the patriot act, and all of this nightmare became as plenty Bush's fault because it became osama bin ladens. i think of by ability of now that we ought to continually all understand that. Bush did not seize Osama via fact he unquestionably benefited greater if Osama became nevertheless obtainable as a magnet to entice money for his schedule. with out him to sell concern, Bush ought to not generate help from the degenerates. Obama inherited this frankenstein and is caught interior the Bush airborne dirt and dirt of stupid wars. yet he's calling a manner out. He employed an psychological to be head of the CIA, Leon Panneta, who figured each and everything out. Then, final week, he replaced Gates as Sec of protection with Panneta. With the two the intelligence and the skill, Panneta took Bin weighted down out.
2016-10-15 00:36:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just Politics
Not More than -- This
All American peoples only listen Bush --- Not the Rest Of The World -- Then They will better know WHo is Who & What Is What
2006-09-14 18:55:59 · answer #5 · answered by SAEED AHMAD 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush is moody and indecisive. He is not exactly presidential material. His opinion or stand on a subject will change as often as his testosterone levels if not more so. I can not wait until his term is over. I hope the next one is a Democrat. I miss Clinton. We need someone like him and we should stay out of the prez's personal life.
2006-09-14 18:53:31 · answer #6 · answered by charity2882 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush has Osama locked up somewhere and will reveal it just before the 2008 elections.
2006-09-14 19:04:23 · answer #7 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush prefers to go after people who had nothing to do with 9/11 to fufill his own personal agenda, why do you think he allowed the attacks in the first place?
2006-09-14 19:07:07 · answer #8 · answered by Roland D. 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the bush family and the bin laden family has had close ties with each other for years so i think bush knows where he is.
2006-09-14 18:51:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think we need to catch Bush and test Article # 3.
2006-09-14 18:51:15 · answer #10 · answered by pickle head 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋