English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For the Champ haters' information. SC has dumped Michigan, Notre Dame, Auburn, Virginia Tech and Oklahoma in the past a couple of years.

They've had only two losses in 3 years and they were decided with a total of 6 points.

34 straight wins. Three Heisman Winners.

2 National Titles.

Now just respect the program cause it's simply one of the best in the history of NCAA football.

And the newest version of the Dynasty is coming...

What y'all know about that?

2006-09-14 16:55:14 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football (American)

shut tha **** up big vol lard. You can't **** with pac-10.

2006-09-16 17:12:38 · update #1

8 answers

Everbody knows that USC is an outstanding team and what they have accomplished. The problem is the competition in their conference has been weak except for Cal and Oregon who is a top 20 bonifide team? In the SEC for example you have Georgia ranked 10, LSU 6, Auburn 3, Florida 7, Tennessee 14, Alabama 25. These teams play hard competition week in and week out. This is not USC's fault but it is the truth.

2006-09-14 17:55:33 · answer #1 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0 0

WAKE UP CRACKHEAD! You went from praising the "Pac-Ten" to glorifying ONLY ONE TEAM! USC alone doesn't comprise the Pac-Ten! Besides, half that conference has sucked for YEARS now.....Arizona, Arizona State, Washington, Washington State, and Stanford SUCK!!!! Not to mention the fact that Tennessee KICKED CALIFORNIA'S A$$ two weeks ago! How are you going to glorify the WHOLE Pac Ten when all you mention is the ONLY team in the league that has consistently been a powerhouse? I don't deny USC's greatness, but the conference as a WHOLE sucks! Look at the SEC. We have nearly HALF the freakin' LEAGUE ranked in the Top 25 almost every year! Auburn, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Tennessee, LSU....These teams ring a bell? THREE of them (Florida, Alabama, and Tennessee) have won a National Title in the last 15 years! How many schools in the Pac Ten have done it? That's right, Only your precious USC. Until they "man up", stop being so lousy outside their league (look at Oregon State getting their a$$ kicked by little ol' Boise State just last week!) and play good football from TOP TO BOTTOM, the Pac Ten will never be a good football league! At least the SEC, Big XII, and Big Ten(eleven) have at least three or four (or more) bowl eligible teams every year and can manage to put more than one in the BCS bowls! The Pac Ten, a strong conference? BWAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Even our weak sisters here in the SEC are competitive for the most part with the exception of Kentucky and Miss. State as of late.

2006-09-15 13:50:22 · answer #2 · answered by bigvol662004 6 · 0 0

1 out of 10. Usc is the Only team in the Pac 10 that has a legitimate shot of winning a National title. Cal is up and coming Oregon will have a good season every once and a while and Ucla has it's moments. If you look at conferences like the Big 10 Big 12 ACC SEC these conferences usually have at least 2 or 3 National Title Contenders.

2006-09-15 00:00:02 · answer #3 · answered by GloryDays49ers 3 · 0 1

What about the rest of the conference, Mr Trojan Fan?
The Pac 10 is known for great offense, specifically passing, but not for defense. Cal had a high preseason nationally ranked defense and they gave up 35 pts to Tennessee.
And I say this as a Pac 10 fan!
The Pac 10 is not a weak conference, it's just not the best conference year in and year out, which usually is the SEC

2006-09-15 01:25:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm from Oregon and right now, the Pac 10 isn't looking that good. I have the feeling that USC will start losing games when they get into the bulk of their season, OSU has shown that they're the same team from last year. Oregon is good but how the season will go still remains to be seen. Personally I don't have confidence in their defense. Stanford is not going to have a good season, neither is Arizona or Washington. Washington State could have a decent year. Cal will have an OK year. I don't know about UCLA because I haven't seen them play but I think they'll just barely make it to a bowl game. Right now, its not looking too good but its only 2 games into the season. We still have, what, 10 games left?

2006-09-15 00:07:17 · answer #5 · answered by nighthawk_842003 6 · 0 0

Beyond USC the pac-10 as a conference is on the same level that the MAC is. USC as the only good team in the pac-10, yeah its true. Oregon, Oregon St., Washington, Washington St., Stanford, Cal, UCLA, Arizona, Arizona St where are their quality non conference wins the past two seasons? The pac-10 is a one team conference in football, thats reality until it changes the other teams in that conference will be fodder for mid level teams in other top tier conferences. Or for that matter Boise State.

2006-09-15 10:09:59 · answer #6 · answered by irishfan46241 4 · 0 1

Dude, you are talking about one team in the pac10, what has the pac 10 done against the sec this year! the best pac 10 team did beat the worst sec team but what about the rest! Cal is overrated and so is Oregon. You can talk some crap if your Trojans get past Nebraska this weekend, however USC will not win the bcs this year!

2006-09-15 00:01:49 · answer #7 · answered by sundevilcajun 3 · 0 3

I hate footbal!!!!!

2006-09-14 23:57:05 · answer #8 · answered by Jay Mariotti 2 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers