If u were JK Rowling, would u kill off Harry Potter in e final bk? Y? If not, who would u kill instead?

Question

There's rising speculations tat Harry Potter will die in his last adventure. Many r protestin & askin other characters 2 b killed off instead. Watz ur take on tis??

Answer 1

Killing Harry off does not make sense. He has gone through so much of trouble and pain for six years fighting Voldemort and for the series to come to an end with Harry’s death does not make a good ending. The readers’ will be left feeling sick and betrayed because they’ve been following Harry’s struggle with Voldemort through six books and Harry dying in book seven would mean that reading the past six books had been a complete waste of time.
Snape dying after saving Harry’s life (he will support Harry in book 7) would be quite dramatic so I think he should bite the dust.

Answer 2

I would not kill Harry off. It just seems wrong. Heck, he's not even full power yet.

Good observation about Malfoy - He is sounding pretty unsure of his role in the good/bad game. That might be an interesting plot twist. And Snape - perhaps he's a double double agent and doesn't even know himself if he is good, bad or indifferent.

What I want to know is what's going to happen with Harry's aunt? I thought she was supposed to become more involved, and she is probably hiding something.

Who would I kill instead of Harry? You know, I can't think of a good reason to get rid of anyone. Glad this isn't my series to complete.:)

Answer 3

I would kill Harry Potter simply because we have followed him through his adventures and it seems natural that the way Voldemort would die is in a battle with Harry. Yet they are two strong forces, so they would probably kill one another in the end.

Answer 4

a huge reminder to all,as ms rowling said MANY times,harry potter is not a kid's book,it's a book written for adults n kids..so thr's no need to be so sugary n nice to end a book,she can kill of as many or none.i want snape,voldermort n generally all evil folks to die,yeh,maybe umbridge too.

Answer 5

it may be the traditionally literary difficulty for Rowling to do. Harry's mom's love for him is what stored him from Voldemort the 1st time, right? (Admittedly, i've got in user-friendly terms watched the movies, yet i understand human beings who've study the books). this could recommend that love ought to triumph over evil. It stands to reason that Harry's love for his friends (this is a working topic during all the books) is what's going to save them and triumph over Voldemort...Plus it could make Harry a Christ-like determine, this is the traditionally literary difficulty to do. numerous books and flicks try this because of the fact sacrificing your self is the spectacular sacrifice. saying some spell could be taking the user-friendly way out in case you inquire from me. the better section approximately it could be that tens of millions of youngsters worldwide huge could completely freak out if she killed off Harry. i think of which would be outstanding.

Answer 6

It is really painful to see harry die but i think its better to end the story that way... 7 books is more than enough,isn't it? If harry lives, more book will be added to the series and it will spoil the story

Answer 7

i think that because of all the ppl who dont want harry potter to die, i might kill him off just to see what everyone would do. if i didnt kill off harry i would kill of malfoy, because i think that malfoy is going to end up being good.

Answer 8

i would kill Harry Potter that would be great end to finish this serie
and i'd kill voldemort and snape either

Answer 9

that just wouldn't seem right for a childrens series. I have a feeling snape will die, which is a shame because I like him the best.

Answer 10

yes.. because there isn't anything else good enough to read about. plus if he doesn't get killed off there will probably be more down the road.