This test only has one question, but it's a very important one. By giving an honest answer, you will discover where you stand morally. The test features
an unlikely, completely fictional situation in which you will have to make a decision. Remember that your answer needs to be honest, yet spontaneous.
Please scroll down slowly and give due consideration to each line.
THE SITUATION
You are in Florida, Miami to be specific. There is chaos all around you caused by a hurricane with severe flooding. This is a flood of biblical
proportions. You are a photojournalist working for a major newspaper, and you're caught in the middle of this epic disaster. The situation is nearly
hopeless. You're trying to shoot career-making photos. There are houses and people swirling around you, some disappearing under the water. Nature is
unleashing all of its destructive fury.
THE TEST
Suddenly you see a man in the water. He is fighting for his life, trying not to be taken down with the debris. You move closer. Somehow the man looks
familiar. You suddenly realize who it is. It's Jesse Jackson! At the same time you notice that the raging waters are about to take him under forever.
You have two options--
You can save the life of Jesse Jackson, or you can shoot a dramatic Pulitzer
Prize-winning photo, documenting the death of one of the world's most powerful politicians.
THE QUESTION
Here's the question,and please give an honest answer:
Would you select high contrast color film, or would you go with the classic
simplicity of black and white?
2006-09-14
16:23:49
·
39 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Social Science
➔ Psychology
You're a pig. Making a joke about allowing someone to die, regardless of what you feel of their political beliefs is sick.
Most people I know that would align themselves politically with you call themselves Christians - but from my point of view (being a Christian myself), those who would laugh at this joke while claiming to be Christian would have a lot of explaining to do on Judgment Day.
So p!ss off.
2006-09-14 16:34:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by tagi_65 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
a) attempt meds first,, yet whilst they do no longer paintings the newborn could come first. b)seek for a distinctive place. Even in maximum good residences they permit u to maintain small canines and cats with a puppy deposit. c)If a cat will become agressive there's a competent clarification why. the 1st project i might do could be to take it to the vet to make advantageous it did no longer have any ailments or injuries that wern't seen to the bare eye. i does no longer provide any puppy to a shield except it is the very final determination. d) If the cat grew to alter into injured and that i could no longer have sufficient funds the vet bill, and that i knew the shield had their very own vets and could desire to shelter the cat remarkable away, i might provide the cat up ( I did could try this as quickly as incredibly)
2016-11-07 08:51:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd have to ask the man in the water next to me to catch this picture of me saving Jesse Jackson. I'd go for the high contrast color film. I couldn't allow this poor man to die without, putting up a fight for him, But, I'd want that picture also. Your mean! Ok ,God Bless you silly one!
2006-09-15 15:53:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by SecretUser 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's a human as we all are,, even though I'm poorer than most of you kids ever dreamed of (thankfully I still have a working puter here)
I'd drop my camera and save him. Not because I agree or disagree with his opinions,, but because he's a fellow living being,,I could NEVER watch any living creature human or not,, die.
As for photo options,, there'd be no option, because my camera would be below the water.
2006-09-14 16:36:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Freedom_Fighter_From_Mars 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd be shooting with a digital camera so I could choose Colour or black and white once I got back to the office. Good question.
2006-09-14 17:28:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
classic simplicity of black & white.
He's black, I'm white....... I'd ditch the camera and try to save him.
Let somebody else take an award winning photo of me and Jesse after we got to safety.
2006-09-14 16:38:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Squirrley Temple 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't be in Florida because I'm not a f*cking dumb*ss like those who stay during hurricanes.
I'd go to Idaho, because I like potatoes, so they might be cheaper there.
and if I did have to choose, high contrast color film. You could always edit it to black and white later on.
2006-09-14 16:28:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would use color film and get as many shots as possible. You can have the color prints converted to black & white later.
2006-09-15 14:32:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by carisse 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
High contrast color film wins hands down! Black and white film just would not capture the thrill of the moment.
2006-09-14 16:26:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Justsyd 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
What kind of stupid question is this? Nobody uses film anymore. Just make sure you bump it up to 6 megapixals before you shoot.
2006-09-14 16:41:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Eegah 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats messed up but id go with Black and White it always makes the picture look more dramatic
2006-09-14 16:27:07
·
answer #11
·
answered by Errol A 2
·
1⤊
2⤋