2006-09-14 15:39:39 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They may feel that if the U.S. were better prepared, we wouldn't have been attacked. I don't agree with that but it could be the basis of their thinking.
2006-09-14 15:42:04 · answer #1 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What makes you think only so-called "liberals" do blaming. There are a lot of "neoconservatives" on the bandwagon now too. A bunch of military generals, some CIA and FBI analyists, some Republicans, ex- government officials, a plethora of books by experts, some old folks who know how to vote and a bunch of Gold Star moms who lost their kids in Bush's invasion, and families of kids who were maimed, brain damaged and more.
There are farmers in the heartland blaming, college students and high school kids who have the nerve to wear anti-Bush teeshirts (and get kicked out of school) and there are a lot of non-liberal leaders of other nations who do some blaming, too.
Except, they're not blaming "everyone" as you say, they're blaming your Bush Administration!
You're a brainwashed propagandist who uses those same old set terms like "liberals" and "terrorists" like there's no tomorrow. Hey, Word Terrorist: Wake up and get with the program. You know you're on the wrong side.
2006-09-14 15:56:05 · answer #2 · answered by Reba K 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dude. Why are you making absolute statements? Why are you saying Liberals Blame anybody for terrorism different than terrorists? Did all liberals interior the worldwide arise on your place and enable you be responsive to "Dude, i individually think of anybody is responsible for terrorism yet terrorists! no longer Osama Bin encumbered, no longer Al-Qaeda, no longer them, yet anybody else!" yet another project... i'm no longer American and it is not a lie that the assumption many people have of the U.S. is unfavourable. I stay in Latin u . s . a . and that i be responsive to that it is the impact many people have. indexed under are some strategies, for one, do you think of that the unpopular conflict in Iraq is assisting the yank reason? No, it is turning out to be extra hatred in direction of the U.S. What does hate create? Terrorism! particular, terrorists ARE blamed for terrorism yet there are different reasons to terrorism. Poverty and social inequities create terrorism. whilst people have no longer something extra useful to do, no longer something extra useful than connect a terrorist group, it is for a reason. I assure you that if for one, Afghanistan have been a extra rich international locations, the Al-Qaeda military wouldnt have been that great. I propose, heavily think of roughly it. Im no longer saying poverty reasons terrorist assaults. despite if, there are various aspects, like poverty, that may lead people in much less greater international locations to alter into terrorists.
2016-11-07 08:45:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you really think these little guys would dare rise against the USA if they weren't feeling threatened, hopeless and cornered by "our" dealings in the Middle-East? Have an open mind and at least think about it. Nobody knows exactly what America, Europe, and big oil are guilty of in the region. We ABSOLUTELY know they put some very evil people into power for favorable trade agreements and MANY suffered and died due to this!!! There may be more than that to the story... and that's bad enough... The USA is accomplishing little now except uniting the whole region against us in an effort to keep things the way they used to be in the oil trade by domination. Why can't the Bushbots see that?
2006-09-14 15:50:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
most liberals are not able to see much past their noses.they are always against big government, except when in office. they are against big gas pricing but will not drill a well off their beach.(Calif.) ( Mass.) all new England coast, did you know Texas and La. have all the gas plants. tell me of wast dumps any place east of Tenn.Texas has no need of other states, all the other states need Texas or they would freeze to death. ever hear the song Freeze a Yankee? should be the Texas State Anthem.liberals can kiss the south end of my north bound Baghdad camel.
2006-09-14 16:02:42 · answer #5 · answered by whodad 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Liberals love to portray everyone as victims of one sort or another. They probably think of the terrorists as victims who had no other choice but to lash out. Sounds idiotic enough to fit the Liberal profile.
2006-09-14 16:33:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
they can only do that if they somehow connect bush to terrorist , micheal moore is an expert in this , and also in a hot dog eating contest
quote from another answer proving my point
"seems to me the only ones doing the killing are the terrorists and the repugs,go figure?"
Source(s):
me
2006-09-14 15:45:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It seems like they have that 'knee jerk' reaction to be the opposite of whatever the conservatives think.
It is kind of like advocating smoking. They will come up with all sorts of studies to prove it is ok, but deep down they know it is wrong. Countless deaths ensue.
Lives of Americans us far too precious to be in the hands of politicians.
poly - many
tics - blood sucking insects
2006-09-14 15:45:26 · answer #8 · answered by extremelyradicalman 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I do blame the terrorists, whatever country they are from and whatever side they are fighting on.
2006-09-14 15:47:18 · answer #9 · answered by ash 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You have to look at reasons for the things people do, There is way way to much partisanship on either side though so much so the real issues are not being handled.
2006-09-14 17:25:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because the president blames the terrorists, and they refuse to agree with him on ANYTHING.
2006-09-14 15:41:46 · answer #11 · answered by DidacticRogue 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋