First I though it was a joke but I have pictures to prove it.
http://mblogger.paulofierro.com/paulo/20041108112802_m.jpg
2006-09-14 15:34:44 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I know........sorry
2006-09-14 15:38:52 · update #1
Oh Man I don't know, I am sorry if I have offended you. Sometimes you have to see humor in everything to keep yourself sane and happy.
2006-09-14 16:02:09 · update #2
That photo isn't from 9/11 and someone flipped the book in the photo using photoshop.
This link debunks that pic and shows the original::
http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/bushbook.asp
2006-09-14 15:47:21 · answer #1 · answered by abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yeah he was so distracted by the terrorist flying planes into the World Trade Center, he continued his stay at the school and didn't take any action for 30 minutes after the second plane crashed. What kind of leader waits 30 minutes after the second plane crashed to take action and protect the country that is relying on him. I am not a Bush Fan, he probably wasn't reading and letting the kids read to him...... Funny guy.... too bad it took 30minutes to get his butt in gear when inocent people were dying in the towers......
2006-09-14 15:51:19 · answer #2 · answered by Krazee about my pets! 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
perhaps you need to bypass to between the Bohemian Grove conferences he attends even as he's doing supposedly human mock sacrafices and ask him. fairly...he's a satanist. bypass to youtube and style in Bush Bohemian Grove. Edit: yet whats up so are you Mr. pagan. This existence is short. i'd not prefer to bear etenity faraway from God. it really is what you're putting your self up for.
2016-11-26 23:54:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing about that day was a joke..including his involvement.
That George Bush had plans to invade Afghanistan on his desk before 9/11 demonstrates only the value of being prepared.
The suggestion that securing a pipeline across Afghanistan figured into the White House’s calculations is as ludicrous as the assertion that oil played a part in determining war in Iraq.
That Afghanistan is once again the world’s principal heroin producer is an unfortunate reality, but to claim the CIA is still actively involved in the narcotics trade is to presume bad faith on the part of the agency.
Mahmood Ahmed, chief of Pakistan’s ISI, must not have authorized an al Qaeda payment of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta days before the attacks, and was not meeting with senior Washington officials over the week of 9/11, because I didn’t read anything about him in the official report.
That Porter Goss met with Ahmed the morning of September 11 in his capacity as Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has no bearing whatsoever upon his recent selection by the White House to head the Central Intelligence Agency.
That Goss's congressional seat encompasses the 9/11 hijackers' Florida base of operation, including their flight schools, is precisely the kind of meaningless factoid a conspiracy theorist would bring up.
It's true that George HW Bush and Dick Cheney spent the evening of September 10 alone in the Oval Office, but what's wrong with old colleagues catching up? And it's true that George HW Bush and Shafig bin Laden, Osama's brother, spent the morning of September 11 together at a board meeting of the Carlyle Group, but the bin Ladens are a big family.
That FEMA arrived in New York on Sept 10 to prepare for a scheduled biowarfare drill, and had a triage centre ready to go that was larger and better equipped than the one that was lost in the collapse of WTC 7, was a lucky twist of fate.
Newsweek’s report that senior Pentagon officials cancelled flights on Sept 10 for the following day on account of security concerns is only newsworthy because of what happened the following morning.
That George Bush's telephone logs for September 11 do not exist should surprise no one, given the confusion of the day.
2006-09-14 15:36:53 · answer #4 · answered by dstr 6 · 1⤊ 6⤋
Have you never sat in front of a group of children and read the book upside down so they can read along with you? Grow up.
2006-09-14 15:46:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He was looking at the pictures. He can't read. He can even barely speak English.
2006-09-14 20:14:33 · answer #6 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
What's your point anyway? You focus on the wrong things. You are terribly naive. Let's see how you react when someone drops a bomb in your lap.
2006-09-14 15:54:48 · answer #7 · answered by hbsizzwell 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
obviously you don't have kids or deal with children. I read to my daughter like that all of the time. Too bad my 4 year old has more common sense then all damnocrats!!
And the lying left idiots wonder why they can't win an election!!!!!!!
2006-09-14 15:39:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Ever think he may have been slightly distracted by planes crashing into the towers ?
2006-09-14 15:38:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋