As everything is going wrong for Bush, do you think this is another example. The way things are going in Saddam Trial he could be found to be Not-Guilty.
2006-09-14 15:33:00 · 11 answers · asked by Blessed 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
control of crazy population is not dictatorship
2006-09-14 15:34:52 · answer #1 · answered by RX 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the judge is probably not "mad." He may just want to live a long time and die a natural death instead of being executed by Saddam supporters. If I were a prosecutor or a lawyer for the defense I wouldn't want to be anywhere NEAR that trial much less be the judge.
2006-09-14 22:37:16 · answer #2 · answered by nquizzitiv 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has that Saddam mustache.He's probably a Baathist.Iraq used to have millions and millions of them, they've all gone into the closet.They like to infiltrate.Ol' Saddam is in a jam nonetheless. Neat comment from him about "crushing the heads" of the Kurdish dudes who testified against him.He might be a monster- but he's got chutzpah.
2006-09-14 22:52:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Judges are supposed to be non-partisan and not comment pro
or con about the accused in the courtroom, so this Judge should
have been thrown out and a pro-tem brought in. To those who
say Saddam was not a dictator, you must be kidding or just plain
ignorant. He certainly was and he killed his own people in cold
blood and buried them in-mass, naked, thrown in huge pits in the
ground. They have been uncovered and large numbers buried....
maybe buried alive, who knows? No American leader has done
things like this and some of those in your answers should be ashamed for saying it. Try living over there one time.
2006-09-14 22:43:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The judge didn't say Saddam WASN'T a dictator, he said he ISN'T a dictator anymore.
Big difference, don't you agree?
2006-09-14 22:52:28 · answer #5 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He SHOULD be found Not guilty. He was NOT a dictator any more than bush is. At least, he was actually elected by the people. He actually had his country under control.....which, btw, is a GOOD thing.
Bush has killed more Iraqis than Saddamm ever did.
2006-09-14 22:37:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think he's mad, I think he's scared. Saddam still has many friends around who have no problem cutting off heads.
2006-09-14 22:37:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well who's fault is that? Of chourse he's going to be found not guilty, you don't catch a war criminal ans set him free again unless your a republican dugh!!!! Oh yes officer, we have the man in custody, oh, it don't matter how many American citizens he's killed, let's just send him back to his own country to be tried so he can get a slap on the hand and be set free!!! Dugh!!!
2006-09-14 22:38:16 · answer #8 · answered by Tammy C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
BUSH HAS KILLED MORE PEOPLE THAN SADDAM EVER DREAMED OF. I DON'T SEE MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE.
2006-09-14 22:38:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope just another damnocratic appointed judge
2006-09-14 23:02:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋