English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Republicans have got to be the biggest idiots I have ever met in my life. A racist republican, now that just doesn't make any sense considering the fact that it was the republican party that set the slaves free. Abraham Lincoln, Hello!!!! And as far as republicans being rich, not necessarily, stupid maybe and greatly in debt, but rich I doubt it. Most republicans aren't intellegent enough to balance a check book much let alone be rich. Now democrats, we're good with money. Did anyone know that Clinton, and this is a fact you can look it up if you'd like. Clinton at one point during his presidency actually erased the national deficet!!!! Whats old Georgy Poorgy puddin pie got it up to now? Republicans aren't rich, they're bankrupt or on there way there.

2006-09-14 15:25:13 · 9 answers · asked by Tammy C 3 in Politics & Government Government

9 answers

It does show that the general public has no say in things or are a suckers when it comes to dealing with strategies; because Clinton did serve the country well, very well! The Economy was good and crime was down!

How did this all happen after having it so good? There's no explaining it, except set-up. For the elections everyone I meat was anti-Bush, yet they got it. Maybe that's the strategy; to make democrates think it's won, so they slack-off.

But I strongly believe it's all set up.

2006-09-14 15:39:20 · answer #1 · answered by kasar777 3 · 0 1

If you believe that the President balances budgets, you are more uninformed and misguided than you already appear.

Notice that you have only the rich to thank for erasing the deficit. They paid all those taxes that closed the gap, so fast in fact, that Congress could not spend the increased tax revenues fast enough. Hence, the balanced budget. There were never any cuts in spending so, like I said, you can thank the rich who will always be the ones bailing out our irresponsible and despicable Congressional spenders.

Uninformed Libs such as yourself will just never get it.

2006-09-14 16:48:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Clinton was the best Republican president we had in a long time. And her husband was, too.
The key issue you need to consider is this: Are you Corporatist or Localist? The Corporatists (whether Churches, Socialists, Corporate weenies, Environmental organizations, etc.) believe that the desires of the group outweigh the rights of the individual. Localists believe that the individual is the root of all social power.
Corporatism is also known as Fascism. The Group COMMANDS the individual to behave, to buy, to battle.
The deficit in Clinton's presidency was erased by the transition from a production economy to a debt-based economy: His strong dollar policies, in combination with the prosperity of the dot-com bubble, invited foreign investments and got people to go further into debt to buy junk they didn't need. The Reagan Bush policies of cheap oil expanded production and transportation industries.
Second Bush tried to follow suit by being friendly to corporations, but his weak dollar policies caused our debt to skyrocket, and then his war mongering popped the oil prices up sky high, making tons of money for his corporate friends in Texas, but destroying our trade balance.
The worst is yet to come when the realization of the housing debt bubble, derivative financing, and auto industry failure all come together for this fall's elections.
The root problem is the money we have spent, giving corporations so much power over the government.
If you want change, keep it in your pocket. Your dollar is your vote and the machines don't count.

2006-09-14 15:39:00 · answer #3 · answered by auntiegrav 6 · 0 2

I looked it up: Clinton never erased the deficit.
http://photos1.blogger.com/img/243/2888/640/Fedincomeoutlay.jpg

The deficit was reduced during the Clinton administration largely because of a: a) Republican congress in combination with a Democrat president; b) Huge tax revenues as a result of the tech-boom - which went bust just has Clinton was leaving office.

Clinton didn't have to deal with 9/11.

2006-09-14 15:33:42 · answer #4 · answered by Will 6 · 1 1

The party of Lincoln is not the republican party of today. Ever since Nixon used his "Southern Strategy" after the democrats passed civil rights legislation in the 1960's republicans have consistently appealed to racists in the South (and elsewhere). There are plenty of racist republicans you don't have to look any further than Yahoo Answers. Plenty of rich ones and plenty of nonracists also. As far as the rest of your comments, they are just petty insults and in fact don't reflect too well on your own intelligence.

2006-09-14 15:46:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

because you in a lot of circumstances blame the sufferer if you're the criminal.. and in case you will get adequate human beings on your side, you're going to stroll depending on the doubt that exists in peoples concepts..ie, rape sufferer/ "she develop into inquiring for it",.. it really is an excellent effortless Humanism and with the aide of the 4th resources (the media) company interests, alongside with the foyer effect they convey, and a gadget that has been in accordance to suppression, robbery and butchery from day one. (imagine of the Land grab that ensued after we were firmly footed the following, The Genocide of the Natives, the Barbery of the Rail highway and Oil adult men etcetcetc) Our entire gadget is in accordance to exploitation.. and the gadget tells us early early on that you "are a winner" or a loser.. those words might want to under no circumstances be uttered yet relax guaranteed those imprints are made again very early, and no you'll deny with a shred of reality that our modern forms of Dogma do not create this way hollow, or fairly institue it more effective, by employing consistent references and pictures of an "top" and "decrease" type.. oftentimes circumstances human beings settle for all of this for a existence time without ever once preventing and thinking their root impulse.. in basic terms examine a number of the solutions to the question, the right in this room sense they could earn it no count number what.. it really is why regardless of in the experience that they are Piss adverse, they are nonetheless harboring hostility about those "Goddamn" lazy welfare moms... with none clue of what truthfully spending, or what the truthfully "workfare" gadget delivers.. in basic terms what their Media Demigods tell them.. on the top of a Monopoly sport, a million individual owns each and every thing, perhaps one individual will run the jails, one individual will run the railroad, and perhaps yet another the monetary business organization.. who's ever left is combating for those spots, some finally end up in penal complicated... get the photo? not something unintended the following.. what it fairly shows is that we've been Devolved by programming, and our personal straightforward sturdy has been replaced with "Christian" sin... thanks Paul and Co.... this is Rome, yet this time the entire international is going to Burn...

2016-11-26 23:52:08 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

"…..was not an expression of ideas, but a bucket of slime emptied in public….an article that did not contain a single fact, not even an invented one, but poured a stream of sneers and adjectives in which nothing was clear except the filthy malice of denouncing without considering proof necessary.”

I think this fits the situation.

2006-09-14 15:34:14 · answer #7 · answered by Roadkill 6 · 2 0

Well aren't you full of seething hate...I think you need to stop spewing misinformation long enough to see that you are being very prejudice yourself...and Georgy actually did lower the deficit, and unemployment, but you seem to be drinking too much rage-ahol to ever believe it (or look it up)

2006-09-14 15:34:11 · answer #8 · answered by ThatguyPete 3 · 2 2

That's nice. You done ranting?

2006-09-14 15:29:16 · answer #9 · answered by Luekas 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers