http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Son0BWduQx4&mode=related&search=
2006-09-14 15:07:32 · 9 answers · asked by william john l 3 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
that will be you on the watch list!!!! tut tut tut !!!
2006-09-14 15:26:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
lets see the guy said a military craft hit the tower right? some white flash?. the flight 93 never crashed? heres my answer
how can any of that be plausable when those alternate answers forget to mention considerable facts.
if it was a military plane in a building then only 3 civilian airliners crashed. where did the 4th one go? into outer space????
you cant subsitite a miliary plane with a comercial plane when records show 4 comercial planes haveing crashed. proof is in the deaths of passengers, airline officals having records showing 4 planes missing, fanmily and relatives showing records of having there loved ones on the aircraft.
the white flash is bullshit. how does a white flash constitute a conspiracy. is just a white flash. probably the nose hitting the building.
if flight 93 never crashed. where are the survivers that can verify this? there are none cos their DEAD. whats the durbris on the field? what about the phone calls on the plane made by passengers saying they gonna try and retake the plane?
governemnet planned the attack thenselves? thats the biggest bunch of horse **** i ever heard.
i mean common.......
2006-09-14 16:37:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look, the conspiracy theorists are totally obsessed. They will twist and turn everything just to make a conspiracy. The truth is plain for you to see - terrorist dogs hijacked planes and killed thousands of people. Plain and simple.
The flash would have been static electricity discharging to earth. A plane carries an enormous amount of charge whilst in flight, which won't usually discharge to earth until the tyres hit the runway. (planes tyres are impregnated with material that conduct electricity) If that charge has not been disapated, it would have sparked as the plane's fuselage approached an earthed part of the trade centre. This is why a helicopter winchman is attached to an earthing strap - if you touch him before his strap touches earth, you will have a hell of a shock. Static electricity is a huge danger in lots of industries, including the one I work in.
Conspiracy theory? Did you see Bin Laden's latest video showing him meeting the hijackers before the event? Get a life some of you.
2006-09-14 18:41:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you know that in this man's organization there is not a single certified engineer? These massive buildings are designed in such a way that if they collapse they will implode so that it minimizes damage done to surrounding structures.
Think about it. IF GWB and the gov. were behind this, WHY would the terrorists confess? The way I understand it King's arguement was that GWB set this up to justify the war on terror - so I highly doubt that bin laden etc would help him out on that.
2006-09-14 15:24:12 · answer #4 · answered by iahp_mom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So do you think that it was not bin laden terrorises in the plane but the US government set it all up? but why would they do that? was it just an excuse so they could go to war? for the oil? i confused please explain more
2006-09-14 15:29:19 · answer #5 · answered by tigeroscar2005 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
can you have official line and true in the same sentance i read quite a bit about these theories and its got to make you wonder
2006-09-14 15:20:56 · answer #6 · answered by keny 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
go to www.popularmechanics.com
everything he said is debunked and explains how and why the towers went down the way they did
2006-09-14 15:18:38 · answer #7 · answered by xjoizey 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I read the article and e-mail notes......he was
not convincing to me.......a bunch of hogwash.
2006-09-14 15:19:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because he stopped taking his medication
2006-09-14 17:09:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋