The 9/11 attack is too logical and easy to explain to consider anything else but a terrorist attack. But then again I am one of those wacky people who looks at facts.
2006-09-14 14:53:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
I believe the President, Chaney, Rumsfeld and others, had plans for the removal of Saddam on their agenda for a long time. After 9/11 they tried to claim He had weapons of mass destruction which He did not have. They pressured the CIA to prove this, the CIA could not prove this but could only say they thought they had these weapons. So tired of waiting Bush invaded Iraq. To have some idea why this adminsitration did this you must look at their way of thinking. Many thought that the First Bush should have taken Saddam out in the first Gulf War but he decided not to due to the loss of life on both sides and also the destabalization of the area. The first Bush thought that the country would break into sections and with no strong leader could destabalize the entire middle east.
Bush II, Chaney and Rumsfeld thought that Saddam should be removed many claim that at least 300,000 Iraqs were killed under his leadership (many claim more). He was always sabre rattling, always a thorn in the side of everyone. President Clinton thought it best just to let him ramble and knock out a site every now and then when he got too loud. Bush and company thought if they could remove Saddam the Middle east would be a better place for it and the Iraq oil could be placed on the world market and we would all live happly ever after. The problem is there was no one or nothing to hold the Iraq people togeather and a few hundred rabble rousers are turning the country into a civil war. We are now seeing thousands of terroist born each day in Iraq and turning the entire muslim world against us. Saddam may have been the murderer of 300,000 Iraqs but I wonder how many will now be killed? So was there a conspiracy. Probably to some extent from the President and his Men. But I believe they were just shooting from the hip to see what would fall.
2006-09-14 22:25:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by RoeB 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't believe that our government had anything to do with the terror attacks. But i do believe that there is more to the story than a few terrorists, i believe its possible that there were a few insiders in this country that had certain "interests" in the ordeal.
For example: Before the terrorist hijacking, the put down stock of American airlines soared to 4000 or so.
Put down stocks- Stock that's put on a company that it will fall in the market.
2006-09-14 23:39:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by jake0008@sbcglobal.net 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess I am a conspiracy theorist because I don't believe much of anything the government tells us...
2006-09-14 21:59:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by tammette39 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
I am of the firm opinion that everything I read may or may not be true. I love entertaining speculation, but I see little point in getting all worked up about conspiracy theories.... you will simply never know for sure.
2006-09-14 21:53:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by sueflower 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
No.I am not a conspiracy theorist, and I do not believe EVERYTHING ANYONE says. Lies, human error etc. not all info is perfect. My father used to say "If in doubt, check it out." Multiple sources, research your fears, doubts....Peace.
2006-09-14 22:20:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by frogspeaceflower 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Arguing this point is getting so tiresome. Only an idiot that doesn't think for himself, and that won't do research to find the truth, believes in all the conspiracies. http://www.obsessionthemovie.com/http://www.zombietime.com/
2006-09-14 22:17:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that Satan, via the Zionists and AIPAC (http://www.aipac.org) control the US Government because no reasonable government would have done what the US has done since 1979.
In return for no OPEC embargos, the US allowed the Zionist lobby free reign over everything.
2006-09-14 21:53:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋