Depends on the state laws. Certain things are a must in many states. Others are not required.
Talk to your agent and/or RE lawyer.
2006-09-14 14:53:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by SPLATT 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, it is not genuine, save for the State of California, which demands such disclosure IF the loss of life got here approximately interior the homestead interior the previous 3 years in hassle-free terms. sources disclosures are excited with regard to the situation of the valuables, and not what befell on the valuables interior the previous. subsequently, if any and all damages to the valuables have been correct repaired, there is not any pick for disclosure, via fact the situation of the valuables isn't affected. A case may be made if the loss of life grew to alter into so infamous that the value of the valuables became affected in a unfavorable style. An occasion may be the homestead of Scott and Laci Peterson, via fact the completed u . s . a . knew of that challenge by way of the information media. different than that, in spite of the undeniable fact that, no disclosures are required of the supplier for a loss of life in a sources.
2016-10-15 00:27:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't believe they legally have to disclose all information. My advice to you would be to get the property inspected first. These people are paid to find something wrong with the property and make sure they do a structural check as will.
2006-09-15 02:46:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by jdecorse25 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most rules that apply to 1 to 4 family homes do not apply for commercial property.
2006-09-14 16:35:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by FreeMedicalcamps.com 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They should unless they dont want to get sued later. They could list the property to be sold "as is"
2006-09-14 14:53:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he just needs to say buyer to verify condition before purchase
2006-09-14 14:53:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Does!! Not dose! Dose, a unit of measurement used when prescribing medicine.
2006-09-16 06:15:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by jc20155 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you don't want to get sued later on it would be a good idea, but I don't know if you legaly HAVE to
2006-09-14 14:52:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by lynnieR 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
morally yes. if not the buyer could come back and sue you.
2006-09-14 15:31:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by MCNY 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
only if asked the right questions.
2006-09-14 14:52:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by papabear7630 2
·
0⤊
0⤋