Apparently ABC's docu-drama "Road to 9/11" accused Clinton of not taking out Osama when he could've. Evidence?

Question

I've heard that the Rep's are so desperate to blame Clinton for everything that they now say Clinton could have taken out Osama, but chose not to. What is the evidence they are using?

Why are they so obsessed with Bill? Are they afraid he will run again?

Answer 1

in the final analysis it seems the blame should be shared by both of them and bush should shoulder the most since there were reports about the threats before 9/11 and most were dismissed as not credible...also even if osama were captured or killed there is no guarantee that 9/11 still would not have happened

Answer 2

This was sent to me in a email, it does kinda point a finger at Clinton for some of the blame, I dont think anyone is afraid he will run again, cause we are not that stupid of a nation to vote him in again!!! But everyone wants to blame someone...... so they look for the easiest to blame........ Hope this provides some info. It was 1987! At a lecture the other day they were playing an old news video of Lt.Col. Oliver North testifying at the Iran-Contra hearings during the Reagan Administration.

There was Ollie in front of God and country getting the third degree, but what he said was stunning!

He was being drilled by a senator; "Did you not recently spend close to $60,000 for a home security system?"

Ollie replied, "Yes, I did, Sir."

The senator continued, trying to get a laugh out of the audience, "Isn't that just a little excessive?"

"No, sir," continued Ollie.

"No? And why not?" the senator asked.

"Because the lives of my family and I were threatened, sir."

"Threatened? By whom?" the senator questioned.

"By a terrorist, sir" Ollie answered.

"Terrorist? What terrorist could possibly scare you that much?"

"His name is Osama bin Laden, sir" Ollie replied.

At this point the senator tried to repeat the name, but couldn't pronounce it, which most people back then probably couldn't. A couple of people laughed at the attempt. Then the senator continued. Why are you so afraid of this man?" the senator asked.

"Because, sir, he is the most evil person alive that I know of", Ollie answered.

"And what do you recommend we do about him?" asked the senator.

"Well, sir, if it was up to me, I would recommend that an assassin team be formed to eliminate him and his men from the face of the earth."

The senator disagreed with this approach, and that was all that was shown of the clip.


By the way, that senator was Al Gore!

Also:

Terrorist pilot Mohammad Atta blew up a bus in Israel in 1986. The Israelis captured, tried and imprisoned him. As part of the Oslo agreement with the Palestinians in 1993, Israel had to agree to release so-called "political prisoners."

However, the Israelis would not release any with blood on their hands, The American President at the time, Bill Clinton, and his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, "insisted" that all prisoners be released.
&nb! sp;
Thus Mohammad Atta was freed and eventually thanked the US by flying an airplane into Tower One of the World Trade Center . This was reported by many of the American TV networks at the time that the terrorists were first identified.
It was censored in the US from all later reports.

If you agree that the American public should be made aware of this fact, pass this on.

Answer 3

Yes, it's true he could have, but under the circumstances it was the right thing to do. Osama was hidding in a village with several innocent civilians, and at the time Osama wasn't as big of a threat as he would later become, so Clinton called it off because it would have done more harm than good.

Answer 4

Read the background of the person who was hired to write and also direct this piece of trash. The director is involved in a right wing organization.
ABC acknowledged that events they were showing were not true, but they said that it was a "movie" so they could do it. Instead of thinking about Clinton, the American people better wake up and think about Bushco and how he is spying on you...it's not just your phone anymore, he wants to make it legal for him to read your mail and emails. And also, why are we in Iraq? Hussein and Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

Answer 5

not precisely genuine. particular, Clinton had the possibility to seize Bin weighted down, however the CIA recommended against it, via fact on the time Bin weighted down became a CIA asset (and can nevertheless be...). Al Quaeda is a creation of the CIA, and Bin weighted down has been "dealt with" by ability of the CIA for years. The CIA became instrumental interior the Russian-Afghanistan conflict, with our forces supporting Afghanistan and Al Queada. As you have observed, the Taliban is taking carry returned in Afghanistan, opium production is 200% what it became formerly the U.S. attack, Al Queada is working with out challenge, Bin weighted down travels freely between the Afghan-Pakistan border, and no person is doing something approximately it. Now, you have been asserting approximately Clinton? How approximately Bush NOW? Who CARES what Clinton might have performed? what's the present administration doing NOW? that is obeying its boss - the CIA! (Who JFK had to do away with. Hmmm...)

Answer 6

Well respected lead CIA officer Gary Schroen who was working to kill Bin Laden has testified that to be true. Of course Clinton lovers are blind to that, since they want to believe that the same guy who was impeached for testifying under oath that he "did not have sex with that women", and who sent Sandy Berger into the National Archives to steal or replace documents would be more truthful that a career CIA man. This has nothing to do with Republicans. While they are not clean and pure, no one can possibly doubt that Clinton was a sleeze on steroids.

Answer 7

Video from a "Predator" drone taken while Clinton was President was shone, and Clinton's own people verified that Clinton would not give the go-ahead to kill OBL.

Answer 8

Evidence? No: Republican "Talking Points". Why? They won't say.