Believe it or not, but there are starkling resemblence between two so-called Great Leaders. Both of them have been head of state of world's most powerful nation. Both of them were democratically elected. And amazingly both of them had support of the people in whatever they did.
As of now, Hitler leads the race of evils. But future will decide who was the most dangerous.
2006-09-14 13:24:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by R 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hitler(pre war) would have handled the relief effort in New Orleans much better and the rebuild would have been complete.
Hitler's response to 9/11 may have resulted the all Muslims would have ended up in the gas chambers
As for Afghanistan, if he had the technology he would have Nuked it
2006-09-14 20:29:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by elvenlike13 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you say at times like these, it would be Bush because Hitler has passed away to Hell. However, If Hitler's accounts during his life are included, then of course Hitler. Bush isn't trying to do complete genocide of a certain group. Of Course, Bush is making so many mistakes that is ruining the U.S. and putting all of us in a tangle of messes. However, he is trying to "make the world a better place." Hilter, just wanted complete power of the world and to dispose of the Jewish community. I SAY HITLER.
2006-09-14 20:29:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Interesting question.
Robert A. Heinlien, the great American writer of science fiction suggested that we should beware of the reform politician. You knew what the corrupt politician would do and could anticipate and avoid the problems
The reformer is not predictable.
The point of this is that both Hitler and Bush act (acted) with good intention. Hitler was patently crazy. Bush appears to be less than bright at the best.
History will tell.
2006-09-14 20:24:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chuck N 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hitler, when he was alive.
Bush had nothing to do with 9/11, or New Orleans, and I can't think of the other dozens of incidents, please fill me in. Please tell us how starting a world war and sending over 11 million people to death camps is comparable to Bush.
I'll be waiting for your added details.
2006-09-14 22:31:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
This one is sure to fire up the republicans....although there are some small similarities there...we have yet to see the full focus of the plan of the republicans.
And mind you...this is a plan FOR ALL CONSERVATIVES(note: not all republicans are conservative or even support Bush), not just Bush.
When I heard the secret prison story on the news a few days ago I literally thought of Hitler immediately. Did you also know that Hitler blew up his own state building and blamed it on the Russians? In turn creating Reich Security (Homeland Security)?
2006-09-14 20:19:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by trevor22in 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
"Zorro" was my childhood hero.
If I were president, I don't think I could sleep knowing I would be responsible for many lives being lost each day.
I would need to take more important steps than are being taken today to get rid of the problems keeping the people in suspense.
I would summon the best in the technology field to offer ways in which to combat the threats we hear abolut today, in a cost effective manner and in a way in which the purported killers wind up killing each other.
Wasting one more soldier's life I would consider a crime and a burden I would carry for the rest of my life.
Wasting the lives of those who don't cherish life would be my endless mission.
2006-09-14 20:28:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush doesn't mean to harm people. By listening to circular information that just gets repeated, he really isn't drawing from a diverse group, on the outside Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice seem diverse but I think Colin Powell dropped off because he couldn't deal with the lack of objective information. No I don't think they are the same but they may end up having the same net result
2006-09-14 20:20:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by magpie 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Adolph Hitler!!! President Bush has not ordered an annihilation of any particular race of people nor finds them less than human. Only those who commit murder does he reject. Check your history books a little closer.
2006-09-14 20:29:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by poet_by_nature 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hitler. The secret prisons are for us, to imprison terrorists and get intel for our security. Bush doesntwant to take over the world, unlike Hitler. bush is also kept in check by congress, but they bicker like little kids, so i guess its up to my militia to keep bush from going (more) crazy.
2006-09-14 20:25:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋