2006-09-14 13:07:58 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You should vote FOR it before you vote against it. It's what you're known for doing!
PS That's why you lost the election in 2004.
2006-09-17 13:40:25 · answer #1 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey , you know the routine. I actually did vote for it, before I voted against it.
2006-09-16 19:54:57 · answer #2 · answered by zzz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you should vote for it, but when the public doesn't like it anymore vote against it.
2006-09-14 20:48:41 · answer #3 · answered by sand7096 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Vote.
2006-09-14 20:09:32 · answer #4 · answered by Black Sabbath 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have asked myself that a time or two once: they had Bonds on the ballet for mental and retardation, and I felt that was needed, but read on and money for additional prison space was also to be spent for prisons. Voted NO! Well prisons were built, so many in fact we imported prisoners to make use of them. Mental health and Retardation? Things still haven't changed much. Our Congressmen struggle all the time with that question.
2006-09-14 20:18:18 · answer #5 · answered by longroad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Against it.
2006-09-14 20:09:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For or against what?
2006-09-14 20:12:11 · answer #7 · answered by jackie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not sure but I will buy you a pair of flip flops when you decide.Will it be before or after you throw the bomb into the rice field behind you and inbed the rice in your *** and ask for a purple heart for it?
2006-09-14 20:11:10 · answer #8 · answered by halfbright 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hey Johnny, do like you always do: Vote for it. Then against it. Then for it. On and on......
Be sure to call your fellow vets: "Murdering Hordes".
2006-09-14 20:13:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
go for it vote for it
2006-09-14 20:10:01 · answer #10 · answered by Cee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋