Hitler went out on a world campaign first, and then tried to get nuclear weapons. Iran is trying to get nuclear arms first. What's your perspective on this serious matter? I bet Ahmadinejad watches "Pinky & The Brain." Are you contemplating what I'm contemplating? says Ahmadinejad.
2006-09-14 12:52:44 · 17 answers · asked by ZORRO 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Hitler. because he *did* what he did.
The Iranian guy is still in the *wanting* to do it stage.
Give him a year or two and ask the question again.
2006-09-14 12:57:33 · answer #1 · answered by ratboy 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ahmadinejad is more dangerous because the post-bomb world is more dangerous. He has a lot more ways to cause trouble than Hitler. Germany was way ahead scientifically at the time, but more information is now in the public domain and much easier to get. Be very worried about Ahmadinejad.
2006-09-14 21:49:43 · answer #2 · answered by united9198 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hitler was more dangerous. He had a superior army and a trained airforce with cutting edge technology and great infra structure and tactics.
Ahmadinejad has not yet come anywhere near to anything that Hitler did nor will he ever be allowed too. I do not believe for one minute that Israel will allow anybody else in the Middle east to have Nuclear capability
2006-09-14 20:04:30 · answer #3 · answered by Bohemian 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler and Ahmadinejad are pretty much alike and we can expect to get WW3 out of Ahmadinejad just like we got WW2 out of Hitler.
2006-09-14 20:01:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Iranian President because he's going to get nuclear weapons.
2006-09-14 21:33:40 · answer #5 · answered by markm 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Iranian Idiot of course. And that is because he is stupid. And stupid people cant rationale and so he is unpredicatble so he can do anything. Hitler oh well...he could have given the Iranian a run for his money but he's long gone.
2006-09-14 20:02:55 · answer #6 · answered by Gatonetor 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hitlers dead he can't hurt anyone now , but i think president bush is more dangerous than the Iranian president , i mean look at what hes done , totally f@#$ed his own people , yea he's the frigen anti christ
2006-09-14 20:10:37 · answer #7 · answered by jojo 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If owning the Nuclear arms is the criteria of being dangerous then how about USA & Israel they own it so why has your list of dangerous people left out Bush & Olmert???
2006-09-14 20:08:02 · answer #8 · answered by Ms_4peace 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you had asked: who would be more dangerous, etc., the answers might have had more variety. It's hard to get up much of a debate over whether or not dead people are less threatening than people still breathing.
;-)
2006-09-14 20:05:47 · answer #9 · answered by WikiJo 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Iranian President because he's still alive.
2006-09-14 19:55:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋