English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-14 12:52:03 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

How come nobody has pointed out that this question is nonsense? :)

2006-09-15 05:10:46 · update #1

14 answers

Yes, some1 could have a heart attack thinking about danger!

2006-09-14 12:56:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not at all! The sense of danger is in fact our instinct for personal safety and well being at a full alert, and this make us realise unpleasant presence of danger in our body - I take that by 'concept' you mean our ability to feel danger. If we do not feel danger at all than you can be in a great danger, or at a great risk. You might walk into a very harmful situation without realising what we are doing. Our sense of danger is for sharper and intuitively elaborate than all conscious faculties of our cultured reasonable mind. This is very instinctual and raw at its best. Doesn't it feel like this? Don’t all considerations of the world go out of the window when it comes to the matters of our personal safety and the safety of the ones we love and care? This then is in complete opposition to you supposition that concept of danger is dangerous. The concept of danger is not dangerous. As long as we do not stay in danger too long to let it turn into anxiety or a habit of constant worrying. All could be well. Take care!

2006-09-15 05:09:35 · answer #2 · answered by Shahid 7 · 0 0

No. The concept of dangerousness is vital to personal preservation and safety. How could I explain to my child that crossing a busy road (or playing with a rattlesnake) isn't safe, and therefore a threat to his continued existence, without the concept of dangerousness? It has evolved as a survival mechanism

2006-09-14 12:58:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

that's incredible that lots of the human beings answering this question do not understand what 'Hyperreality' is. they only needed to look at WikiPedia, yet they have not performed it, believing that their imprecise thought may be sufficient and then they're merely writing nonsense of their answer. it is an occasion for 'Hyperreality': human beings have faith they understand something and lifting themselves of their self image on a a strategies better pedestal than each and all the others that understand not something. With this they're feeling improved yet unquestionably it is in accordance with pretend expertise, that's their created 'Hyperreality'. they only needed to seek and can have gained real expertise, yet they have been too lazy and that they have been so ignorant that they have been believing themselves their pretending. With the risk that they fill up priceless area with their stupidities. it is in hassle-free terms an person-friendly occasion, yet what occurs as a effect of the well-known Hyperreality in our society is so risky that if one touches this concern, then no physique desires to appreciate approximately it via fact the well-known international view with all their residences might crumple. So between the risks of Hyperreality is that persons are carry in lack of expertise, they don't ask questions and that they don't pick to be touched of their self image that's in accordance with a pretend certainty. a rather hopeless challenge and it seems certainly like humanity is destroying itself being caught in pretend certainty... InkyPinkie

2016-10-15 00:23:19 · answer #4 · answered by swett 4 · 0 0

In that it excites and the thought of it thrills...may spur some on to do dangerous things as the concept stirs something within them.

2006-09-14 13:22:04 · answer #5 · answered by Saskia M 4 · 0 0

No. If we'd had no sense of danger back when we were grazing animals on the Serengeti (or wherever it was we grazed), we wouldn't have run from predators, and so would have been killed.

'It is not a man's opinions that matter, but what his opinions make of him.' -G.C. Lichtenberg (at least that's roughly what he said.)

2006-09-14 14:57:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, because having awareness of danger increases the probability of avoiding its consequences

2006-09-14 12:56:36 · answer #7 · answered by Ben H 2 · 0 0

No , with out a concept of danger . negative reinforcement would be with out purpose ,and we would be forever sticking our fingers on the stove .

2006-09-14 13:22:53 · answer #8 · answered by kevin d 4 · 0 0

no the concept of danger comes from our instinct for self preservation .

2006-09-14 12:55:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nope

2006-09-14 12:59:01 · answer #10 · answered by mørbidsшεεŧnεss 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers