2006-09-14 12:38:38 · 8 answers · asked by Mr. Sky 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
As William Blake said, "Art is the tree of life. Science is the tree of death." Ah, but what did he know anyway? He was just a poet, an artist and some kinda wacky libertarian fella.
2006-09-14 13:50:56 · answer #1 · answered by gotalife 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I couldn't live without art in it's many, many forms. What a boring life. Heck, Even Vulcans have and appreciate art!
I may not live as long without science - but that is debatable - quality of life is more important than quantity of years.
2006-09-15 12:23:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that science saves more lives than art so I would sadly have to vote for science. I really hate to say this.
If this were the reality though I'd probably arrange petri dishes in fetching colour schemes.
2006-09-15 09:31:46 · answer #3 · answered by Ragdollfloozie is Pensive! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ART and no science/because Art can always make a mockery of science, but science can never make a mockery of ART.
2006-09-15 10:24:14 · answer #4 · answered by Jujeaux 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I have to choose one, I would pick art.
2006-09-14 19:41:14 · answer #5 · answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Art is what I thrive on, so it's a tough question....
Saddies
2006-09-14 19:40:58 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I want both.
Tammi Dee
2006-09-14 19:41:13 · answer #7 · answered by tammidee10 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't matter, both would be pretty damn worthless.
2006-09-15 16:18:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋