No. But I read today that they were so sure that she was having a girl that they haven't chosen a boys name for the poor little thing. Talk about wanted!
2006-09-14 11:32:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alicat 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I had read somewhere that she was having a girl and even had the name---
Jailynn for her. But she had a boy a few days ago and I haven't heard anything about a name for him. I think everyone should realize that she is a young woman, married and now with 2 small children. And not bash her so much. I am not really a fan of hers, my daughters are and I know that if I were in the news all the time........it would be awful
2006-09-14 12:02:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Britney has already had her baby. It was a baby boy. She supposdly played games on the media saying it was going to be a little girl to get more publicity
2006-09-14 11:38:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by tmrcx 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
They noted as him Sutton Pierce, to grant him an identical initials as Sean Preston. Brit wanted the lads to have then same birthday, yet Sutton became born 2 days earlier. There wedding ceremony anniversary is arising quickly too.
2016-11-07 08:19:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ive even seen on a couple of magazines on the news stand that say she had a girl. But on the news it says a boy.
2006-09-14 11:32:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mom 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, she had a baby boy on Sept 12,early morning. She named him Sutton Pierce Federline...well better than Shiloh
2006-09-14 11:39:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kay 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I always heard it was a boy..i think she is going to keep trying for a girl.
2006-09-14 11:54:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Britney Spears gave birth to a baby boy last year.This year Briteny will have a girl.
2006-09-14 11:32:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
well ya she is having another baby! its been all over. she is like 8 months in and in one magizine i read that she was gaving a girl, and another one a boy. so this just means dont believe what u read in magazines!
2006-09-14 11:34:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by =]] 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
tabloids said she was having a girl. but you know maybe the family genes just don't produce big units and they couldn't see the boys pecker
2006-09-14 11:32:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by ~Saratini~ 4
·
4⤊
0⤋