No, but I'll be breathing a sigh of relief in 2008 when his butt is out of the White House.
2006-09-14 11:16:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lunarsight 5
·
6⤊
5⤋
First of all, George W .Bush is NOT losing the War in Iraq. Progress is happening everyday in Iraq. Schools are being built where the Future Leaders of Iraq are going to be educated, the electronic industry is booming throughout Iraq, and security forces are growing.
Second, There are only three news sources that tell you the TRUTH of what is happening in Iraq. The first is Fox News, the second is the Christian Broadcasting Network, and the third is Rush Limbaugh.
Finally, I want to leave you with a quote by Simon Wiesenthal who is a Holocaust Survivor and during his lifetime was a Human Rights Activist who said "The Allies do not seek to conquer Iraq but rather Iraq but rather to confront a dictator who has used weapons of mass destructions and committed genocide against his own people. Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933, but for six years the world did not act. Has he been taken seriously then, the lives of innocent millions may have been spared." Wiesenthal believed that if Hitler would have been taken serioiusly when he came into power, the events of the Second World War could have been prevented and the history of the world would have been altered forever.
2006-09-15 17:35:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The anti-war crowd blantantly undermines the efforts of our military and our leaders for their own political gain. To them it is more important to return to politcal power than the positive outcome of a world wide effort to defeat the spread of radical Islam and the terror it inspires. The enemy in Iraq read the news, and monitor the prevailing mood of Americans and then act. They are embolden for another day to kill an American soldier or an Iraqi that wants a better country when they see words such as yours.
Your words have an impact.
2006-09-14 11:27:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by nobody 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
If the United States of America loses a war, I am never going to laugh. War is a terrible thing, sometimes it is necessary. The world is becoming smaller, so we must all learn to get along together. I guess it sounds simple.
2006-09-14 12:05:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Andrew G 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, I will not laugh at Bush for losing in Iraq; I'm to frustrated with his policies to laugh at him. As much as I dislike Bush, I still will not laugh at him, because it is us the citizens of the United Sates that will be losing. Bush will walk away without remorse, no matter how much we know that it was and is the wrong thing to do.
2006-09-14 11:17:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tommy D 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
No.
I have always been opposed to this war.
And there is nothing funny about it.
Unlike the president, I understand that the American and Iraqi lives involved have greater meaning than the political welfare of the president--that the war is about its human cost, not its political fallout for the Commander in Chief. This is a lesson, if you are truly anti-war, you must learn as well.
2006-09-14 11:16:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by snowbaal 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
Yes, he does seem to have us up a creek, but it won't be laughter you'll hear if he loses in Iraq. After all, whatever happens over there will ultimately affect us all. We'd better be praying that there is someone Up There listening to the prayers of us sensible people.
2006-09-14 11:19:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by worldwise1 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I certainly wouldn't laugh. I don't approve of Bush, his methods, or this "war", but I DO support our service people. Why would I laugh at the loss of thousands of lives?
2006-09-14 11:16:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
Like it or not, he represents all of us as our leader...So to laugh at him is to not only laughing at your self...But all those that died fighting.
Yeah, that's funny isn't it?
Oh and maybe you should pay more attention in school as the senate and house authorized this war...It's their job to make sure the President isn't lying or wrong with his proposal to go to war in the first place....Yet you don't say crap about that. So who failed worse??? One President versus hundreds in the house and senate?
Here, learn something so next time you talk you wont sound like such an idiot.
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/11/iraq.us/
This should teach you a lesson to stop being a liberal parrot.
2006-09-14 11:23:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by joe b 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Why would anyone want to lose a war? What is wrong with you that that would make you happy? A bunch of soldiers dying in vain?
Did you NOT learn in school that we got freedom in OUR country by rebelling against the British - with the help of the French? Why shouldn't we help the Iraqiis win their own freedom? Was it okay with you that Saddam Hussein gassed hundreds of thousands of his own people?
The shame is on you. I hope you're happy in your ignorance.
2006-09-14 11:12:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by RAR24 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
of course i will laugh, because i've been tired telling everyone that he is using our army and our resources for his own, and thanks to his supporters who will realize the truth, but it will be too late then,
the real question now is, what will we do with bush if he loses? and even if we kill him, would that make any diffrence...?
the only problem most of us has, is that we dont think about the future,
why wouldnt you think that, after our army has been wasted in oil wars, what if the nation is attacked, who will defend us ?
I would list a lot of other scary questions about the future, but most of you wouldnt like it so much...
anyway, everyone suit yourself
2006-09-14 12:49:35
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? ? 3
·
2⤊
1⤋