English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean, they missed out the whole Romulan Wars in the enterprise series so they could go back and make a film set during it. We'd get to see real good space battle set-pieces and all the good characters from that series (Shran, Soval, etc). What does everyone think?

2006-09-14 10:20:57 · 20 answers · asked by Knight-wing 3 in Entertainment & Music Movies

20 answers

Sure, if they can keep it with Roddenberry's storyline. God only knows what the hell was happening on that series by the end. I miss Hoshi (hot!), but I'm glad the series is dead.

2006-09-14 10:28:16 · answer #1 · answered by Brian L 7 · 1 0

Absolutely no way -Enterprise should never have been released or shown on national television - it was a complete insult to Star Trek fans everywhere, it should never have been contemplated after all Voyager only just passed the grade. Neither shows can ever compete with the original high standards set by the Captain Kirk - Captain Picard and eventually Captain Sisco.

This standard cannot be allowed to slip any further it would be a complete travesty and Gene Roddenberry would definitely not allow it if he were still alive today

2006-09-14 20:26:01 · answer #2 · answered by Thisismyview 4 · 0 0

There is a new Star Trek movie already underway, and it will likely be set before the original series time-line, but it will NOT be the 'Enterprise' cast or characters. It will possibly be written and/or directed by J.J. Abrams, the creator of 'Lost'.

2006-09-14 17:50:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Enterprise was an abomination- the red-headed stepchild of the Star Trek universe. They utterly failed to build a plausible prequel to the Kirk-Spock-McCoy era.


Let Enterprise rest in peace, don't disturb the zombie (Hoshi and T'Pol's crop-topped catfight aside)

2006-09-14 17:29:48 · answer #4 · answered by C-Man 7 · 0 0

i like all of the different star trek series apart from the most recent one called enterprise..

enterprise is blooming rubbish to put it politely the series was trash , the acting was diabolical and there was no sense of gene Roddenberry's humour or influence

2006-09-14 18:49:38 · answer #5 · answered by ck 2 · 0 0

Nah, Enterprise was badly written and had weak story lines. Make a feature length quantum leap!

2006-09-14 17:28:38 · answer #6 · answered by alex p 3 · 0 0

Who are these idiots who keep saying "Star Wars was rubbish"?

Since when was this a question about Star Wars?

If there's one thing that's worse than a Sci-Fi Geek, thats someone who says they hate something when they don't even know what it is they purport to hate.

And yes, I am a Sci-Fi Geek ;-)

2006-09-14 17:37:48 · answer #7 · answered by Swampy_Bogtrotter 4 · 1 0

the series wasn't that good cos the story went too fast, so maybe a film to fill in the gaps would be good xx

2006-09-14 18:24:36 · answer #8 · answered by purpletrace999 2 · 0 0

Noooooooo!

2006-09-14 17:30:18 · answer #9 · answered by tagette 5 · 0 0

I think it would be good...Something that was more in Canon. They broke canon a lot in Enterprise and I think that is why it died.

2006-09-14 17:24:24 · answer #10 · answered by want it bad 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers