Or should the football team get the benefit of all the proceeds?
2006-09-14 10:17:34 · 11 answers · asked by olin1963 6 in Education & Reference ➔ Teaching
Money from football games goes to the school ASB fund and all benefit. It doesnt just go to the football team, it it did, their wouldn't be any womens sports or JV sports in college either
2006-09-14 10:22:04 · answer #1 · answered by housewrkrm 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question. Set up an experiment. At the next football game, have no band and no cheerleading but charge admission. Then, set up a band concert with not football and no cheerleading but charge admission. Then set up cheerleading with no band and no football and charge admission. Split the proceeds of all your football bames in proportion to the ticket sales at each of the events.
2006-09-14 10:30:43 · answer #2 · answered by DelK 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, the only reason I go to football games is to see the marching band. Also, marching bands DON'T generally have concerts, so they don't get money from the public. Marching band expenses are paid out of pocket or through a lot of fundraising, and things like instruments, wool uniforms, and sheet music are all expensive. Plus in most high schools there are more oppertunities for the athletic boosters to make money than the band boosters.
2006-09-14 10:30:19 · answer #3 · answered by irishprincess21588 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why should it benefit for the band and cheerleaders too?
The band has it's own concerts; they are just there to support the team.
Cheerleaders are there to support the team.
They aren't being paid to do it. I think to say that that proceeds would go to everyone involved is just unrealistic.
2006-09-14 10:25:28 · answer #4 · answered by FaZizzle 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the parent and student show up for their friends in whicheve group they are in so the even split would be by number of kidds in each group. That would probably still give more to the football players as they are ushaly the largest group on the field.
2006-09-14 12:09:26 · answer #5 · answered by christopher S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yet Bevo, we've not even had our first interest! The fools from the soccer have been our next opponent! this completely screws up the gameplan! What are you thinking?! Get your head outta your a$$ and we could play some soccer! sigh. in the adventure that your constructive, guess we are bringing up Joel D. contained in the intensity chart. he substitute into the backup. we could desire he's like Cassel. EDIT: Nikky, any specific reason for those colorings??? EDIT: yeah,yeah, i substitute into merely hoping it wasn't that glaring....
2016-09-30 23:14:19 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe, in theory. But, the fact is people don't pay $$ for HS
football to watch/hear the band or cheerleaders
2006-09-14 10:25:48 · answer #7 · answered by wallyinsa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure they should-----usually all athletic monies are deposited into one fund and then each team sport receives a percentage.
2006-09-14 12:55:22 · answer #8 · answered by violetb 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Actually the whole athletic department.
2006-09-14 10:25:19 · answer #9 · answered by Special Ed 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They probably are to an extent, but if not they should get a small percentage. It doesn't take nearly as much to operate them.
2006-09-14 10:20:37 · answer #10 · answered by shominyyuspa 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋