2006-09-14 10:12:44 · 9 answers · asked by indianincredible 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
It is the method taught in public school.
2006-09-14 14:20:53 · answer #1 · answered by dredude52 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It all depends if you consider the issue of a loser, and the winner as a duel in a game on a battlefield. Got it ?
2006-09-14 14:13:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In order to win at something you have to beat someone or something, so there has to be a loser. Just like how there is an opposite to good and evil - there always must be an opposite.
2006-09-14 10:34:30 · answer #3 · answered by Paley Pale 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Newtons third law
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Winners exist only when losers exist
2006-09-14 10:32:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
opposites attract
similars repell
so to balance winners & loosers
but they are not always equal in ratio
BUT
who decides who won & who lost
the winner lost something ( yes ) even if they win
The looser wins something ( YES !! ) but the judge is unaware
2006-09-14 12:29:12 · answer #5 · answered by thePACK 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It creates a balance in the Universe and if it weren't so, there'd be a rip in the space time continuum that would utterly annihilate us.....
2006-09-14 12:46:00 · answer #6 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ever see a race with just one horse?
2006-09-14 10:15:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ever hear of a "win-win situation"?
2006-09-14 10:16:07 · answer #8 · answered by James S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
c'est la vie.
2006-09-14 11:14:37 · answer #9 · answered by MEDO 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋