http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060913/ap_on_hi_te/electronic_voting
republicans own diebold texas.
2006-09-14 09:41:50 · 21 answers · asked by Ebee 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Why do repukelicans kill innocent women and children in foreign countries, but try to save unborn children in this country?
2006-09-14 09:55:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 8⤋
A Princeton University computer science professor added new fuel Wednesday to claims that electronic voting machines used across much of the country are vulnerable to hacking that could alter vote totals or disable machines.
You do know this professor is a liberal democrat.
2006-09-14 12:00:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm Shiraz:
You're an idiot. Republicans and Democrats both are fighting the war, and they're not over there randomly killing innocent women and children. And, they're not over there killing so they can have sex without consequences.
To answer the question:
Why would you think they are Republicans? Let's review: The article is about students who demonstrated the ease with which it could be done, and then PUBLISHED the results in order to bring public attention to the problem. Come to think of it, they probably are Republicans. Democrats would've only distributed the technique to people looking to steal votes.
2006-09-14 10:10:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
that's what makes you the common sheeple. The powers that be do no longer care who wins. They already own the two one in each of them. no longer something new decrease than the solar right here. no remember what you do the winner will throw the form out the window and you sheeple will all basically take it. Oh and Billy Mays above me. My amazing puddy i offered from you does not artwork. i choose a reimbursement. LOL
2016-12-18 10:19:33 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kind of an a priori question isn't it? Especially given how Democrats seem to specialize in electoral fraud. The 1960 election was won by Kennedy because tens of thousands of dead people voted for him in Illinois. Heck, during the 2000 election, Milwaukee TV stations filmed Democratic ward heels giving bums $10 bills to vote outside of key polling stations. Oh, and let's not forget Lyndon Johnson's theft of his 1948 senate race.
So let's abandon the shrill rhetoric, shall we?
2006-09-14 09:46:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
Seems to me it would be more beneficial than dragging out dead voters, as was done recently in Washington state. The dems were losing the election so they had a 3rd vote count and lo and behold, many dead, many not eligilble.... getting the picture? Who knows how many other states have that same operation... like Illinois.. had quite a fiasco a few years ago... probably before you were born.. but is a consistant practice of the democrats..
2006-09-14 09:48:24 · answer #6 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I guess it beats what the democrats do in finding ways for dead people too vote for them.... and the republican party does not own diebold.....quite trying to spread your lies......a question for you why do you democrats keep whining and complaining every time your party loses!
2006-09-14 09:47:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Paperless machines in Ohio call into question the legitimacy of the results there!
2006-09-14 09:45:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Do you honestly in your heart believe that if there was a way to hack into these systems that any democrat would allow this technology to be rolled out? Let's be a little sensible here okay?
2006-09-14 09:43:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Sounds like something a Democrat would do. I wonder if Democrats will switch to this method from slashing tires.
http://www.bestandworst.com/v/?id=65550
2006-09-14 09:48:58 · answer #10 · answered by Will 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
You're talkin dishonesty here..... Clearly a Dems way of life, but, hey.... Nice try!
2006-09-14 10:12:27 · answer #11 · answered by Katz 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋