Anyone would have been better but I AM GLAD LUKAS WON
Supernova songs suck and they got the sucky singer they deserved..I would hate for Dilana's or anyone else's career to have tanked due to that crappy group
2006-09-14 07:46:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dilan was a far superior singer to Lukas. He made every song sound the same. Dilana's range was greater. She also has the ability to sing in many different genres and make them all work for her. All Lukas is is an accent.
I am still SHOCKED that he was selected as the front-man.
I would like to think that in the end, Dilana got the better prize. A solo career, produced and co-written with GIlby CLark and Dave Navarro on guitar. Lukas will dissapear in front of the supergroup.
I am also looking forward to beign able to download Storm's original. LadyLike. I think she too was a better singer than Lukas. He was my least favorite voice to listen to.
2006-09-14 17:38:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jessica D 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. I would have preferred Dilana over Lukas, but I would have preferred Toby over both of them because of his ability to get the crowd going. I can remember his original song, but can't remember ANY of Supernova's original songs that were performed. Maybe it's just because he played his song about 3 times, though... nah ... I just thought his was more enjoyable.
Dilana has an amazing & interesting voice. She can sound gritty when she needs to & soulful too.
I think Lukas is "ok", but I had trouble getting past his resemblance of the little goat puppets in The Sound of Music. Remember them? And his voice didn't really do much for me. It was interesting, but not interesting enough.
Oh well ... I wish Supernova the best of luck. I'll be looking forward to Dilana's & Toby's upcoming albums.
2006-09-14 14:50:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by GeeNancy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely! The decision to choose Lukas over Dilana is shocking. I truly think all of America was dumbfounded last night when TL announced that Lukas was the winner. Everyoone is talking about it and I have sworn off rockstar now twice, first because of JD, and now because munchkin was chosen. Follow the yellow brick road.
2006-09-14 16:21:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by sicilia 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The hell with Delana, Justin Timberlake would have been better than Lukas. What was up with that lip gloss???
2006-09-14 14:48:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by buldawg 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes YES yes!
Delana all the way.
There are millions of freaks like Lukas with their crazy hair and punk attitude. Sure, he has a great voice, but he doesn't have "IT"
Delana is nuts, different, does her own thing, has a great voice..
she's original!
2006-09-14 14:45:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by El Diabl020 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
RYAN STAR WAS THE BEST!!!!!!!!!!
Lukas and Dilana SUCK suck SUCK!!!!!!!!!!! Ryan Star deserved it more than both of them put together. Lukas and Dilana are too punk for Supernova. I will only buy the cd for the new sounds and the music (lyrics) not for Lukas!!
2006-09-14 15:19:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by $C3N3 . FR3$H 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
most definitely!with dilana,you get raw talent plus that x factor that makes everyone want to mosh right along with her!sure,lukas has talent too,but his attitude stinks big time
2006-09-14 14:50:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by dylysh 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dilana was my pick to win. To be honest I would have liked to see almost all of them win other than Lucas. He was my least favourite of all the singers. He gets on my nerves. I prayed Dilana would get it, but part of me thought, it wouldn't happen, but I never imagined she would get beat out by Lucas!
2006-09-14 15:02:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by edge 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
almost anybody would have been better than Lukas.....Delana, Toby, Storm
2006-09-14 14:45:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋