Are Conservatives on Bin Laden's payroll?

Answer 1

They sure have done a great job achieving Bin Laden's goals!

He wanted US troops out of saudi -- They're gone.
He wanted moderate arabs to choose sides -- Bush said you're either with us or against us, they chose.
He wanted to be considered as a general rather than a dirty criminial -- Bush said his crime was an "act of war" promoting him instantly to the role of General or Head of State.
He's still Alive
He Hasn't been caught
We haven't punished the 2 countries that supplied him with the terrorists and the money (conservatives will have to look this up because they forgot where the hijakers actually came from.)

Answer 2

Could be.Bush and many of his ilk have strong connections.See the answers to "Are Liberals on Bin Laden's Payroll".

Answer 3

Actually it was the Democratic party and their friends in the media that made public terrorists funds being tracked .Looks like the Republicans are trying to stop the terrorist cash flow but the Democrats are fighting it tooth and nail.. Makes you wonder if they're on ole'Bins' payroll......

Answer 4

That Dave Frasca of the FBI’s Radical Fundamentalist Unit received a promotion after quashing multiple, urgent requests for investigations into al Qaeda assets training at flight schools in the summer of 2001 does appear on the surface odd, but undoubtedly there's a good reason for it, quite possibly classified.

That FBI informant Randy Glass, working an undercover sting, was told by Pakistani intelligence operatives that the World Trade Center towers were coming down, and that his repeated warnings which continued until weeks before the attacks, including the mention of planes used as weapons, were ignored by federal authorities, is simply one of the many "What Ifs" of that tragic day.

That over the summer of 2001 Washington received many urgent, senior-level warnings from foreign intelligence agencies and governments - including those of Germany, France, Great Britain, Russia, Egypt, Israel, Morocco, Afghanistan and others - of impending terror attacks using hijacked aircraft and did nothing, demonstrates the pressing need for a new Intelligence Czar.

That John Ashcroft stopped flying commercial aircraft in July 2001 on account of security considerations had nothing to do with warnings regarding September 11, because he said so to the 9/11 Commission.

That former lead counsel for the House David Schippers says he’d taken to John Ashcroft’s office specific warnings he’d learned from FBI agents in New York of an impending attack – even naming the proposed dates, names of the hijackers and the targets – and that the investigations had been stymied and the agents threatened, proves nothing but David Schipper’s pathetic need for attention.

That Garth Nicolson received two warnings from contacts in the intelligence community and one from a North African head of state, which included specific site, date and source of the attacks, and passed the information to the Defense Department and the National Security Council to evidently no effect, clearly amounts to nothing, since virtually nobody has ever heard of him.

That in the months prior to September 11, self-described US intelligence operative Delmart Vreeland sought, from a Toronto jail cell, to get US and Canadian authorities to heed his warning of his accidental discovery of impending catastrophic attacks is worthless, since Vreeland was a dubious character, notwithstanding the fact that many of his claims have since been proven true.

That FBI Special Investigator Robert Wright claims that agents assigned to intelligence operations actually protect terrorists from investigation and prosecution, that the FBI shut down his probe into terrorist training camps, and that he was removed from a money-laundering case that had a direct link to terrorism, sounds like yet more sour grapes from a disgruntled employee.

That George Bush had plans to invade Afghanistan on his desk before 9/11 demonstrates only the value of being prepared.

The suggestion that securing a pipeline across Afghanistan figured into the White House’s calculations is as ludicrous as the assertion that oil played a part in determining war in Iraq.

That Afghanistan is once again the world’s principal heroin producer is an unfortunate reality, but to claim the CIA is still actively involved in the narcotics trade is to presume bad faith on the part of the agency.

Mahmood Ahmed, chief of Pakistan’s ISI, must not have authorized an al Qaeda payment of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta days before the attacks, and was not meeting with senior Washington officials over the week of 9/11, because I didn’t read anything about him in the official report.

Answer 5

You've got it ************. It's the Dems(Clinton) that let the terrorists bomb our embassies, bomb the WTC in 93, the USS Cole, and they chose to sit, and do nothing. It's the Dems that are worried about giving terrorists civil rights instead of worrying about the fact that these cowards want us dead! The Dem's record on terrorism speaks for it's self.

Answer 6

Liberals are on everyone's payroll. Especially our taxpayers paying them welfare.

Answer 7

Don't they work for him ?

Answer 8

Screaming Liberal, you are a bafoon.